Agree.He was lucky with 4.
The kid was buried into the turf.
Not sure what Broady was thinking.
Take the 4 weeks and run
King's simply a media squib looking to generate clicks, he's not the tribunal so therefore irrelevant. Still didn't answer my question Ian4. If it was Texas dumped Broady how many would you be calling for??isn't David King calling for 6? I know he's always overdramatic, but FFS.
Not just the first time, the only timeNot as good a bloke as Bachar whose suspension the AFL determined for the first time in history was manifestly inadequate.
The sooner Gilligan departs, and Benny takes over the better.
Of course not because they're two completely different scenarios to start with. Once the stabbing starts is when the scenarios become similar.Two people are out on the street, one is brandishing a machete in a threatening manner, one is carrying a letter opener in their pocket, do we treat these equally because nobody was stabbed?
As long as it is applied consistently across the board from now on.
Somehow I think that will be difficult for Michael Christian and his merry band of mouthbreathers.
Hard to say it wasn't premeditated. It only took a second but in that moment his actions in picking up, pinning and flinging Parnell to the ground were totally reckless. He is an experienced and gifted player. He has let his team mates and himself down. Hoping for 3 but can't complain given the vigour of the tackle.I hope that Parnell doesn't suffer any long term problems.
I feel for Broady, it wasn't a premeditated action.
More chance of Eliza Gonzalez hitting me up tonight on Raya than the AFL applying anything consistently.
If Broady was a serial offender like Buddy Franklin, then yes there could be some doubt on whether it was premeditated.Hard to say it wasn't premeditated. It only took a second but in that moment his actions in picking up, pinning and flinging Parnell to the ground were totally reckless. He is an experienced and gifted player. He has let his team mates and himself down. Hoping for 3 but can't complain given the vigour of the tackle.
He seems like a ripping bloke and this won't sit well.
How did Stewart get only 4 knocking out someone cold miles away from the ball the hypocrisy of this organisation.
That should have been 6 weeks
Craig Lambert agreesThis is an example of why following AFL in this space is so difficult.
One week after dangerous bumps attracted lesser penalties, one of which the perpetrator was off the ground whilst delivering it , an in play incident is deemed worse.
Don’t get me wrong if the AFL deems such actions as this as worth 4 weeks then that’s fine but don’t be so inconsistent as to make a mockery of the system.
Of course the inconsistency also affects the club who watched their best midfielder at the time in 2022 get polaxed by a player off the ball and get the same penalty. They are going to feel aggrieved.
I am with the afl on the aim but is consistency really so difficult ?
According to the paper this morning he received a reduced sentence.Deserved 3 weeks.
Got 4 due to media speculation and optics.
And everyone has to cop it on the chin and move on.
Not me. I believe in fairness and consistency.
Still didn't answer my question Ian4. If it was Texas dumped Broady how many would you be calling for??
Broad has never been a dirty player, hard at it yes but not dirty. He went over the top on this occasion for whatever reason so has copped the penalty.