Seems like a born tagger to me. Run with a few of the big names to make them uncomfortable and hurt them the other way. What would I know….
Agreed
As I’ve said before I don’t side with the getting him to 100 games just because he has kids .
If we want to keep a senior player who busts his guts on a wing and is a great club man ,while leaving the other wing for a kid to learn his trade then keep KMac .
I can’t buy the Pickett as a forward from anyone , 18 months of nothing proves this , one game where commentators highlighted MP doing a tap on was all we could find as a highlight .
The Myth for me with MP is flexibility, he’s been a very good AFL wingman and thats it , no good as a forward and though many have called for him to go into the middle , fact is he dosent have the needed clean touch in there otherwise we would have played him there
I still see the brilliance he does , however the turnovers have become more and though he tackles as good as any we have the one handed aerial attempts are as bad as we have .
As achillies said play him as a tagger , imho that’s the only role worth persisting with , in saying that there’s kids who could learn the future roles better by starting out as taggers .
Of all the over 30s MP is probably the soundest body ( calf a worry ) , however I see enough “ role” senior players in that bunch and I rather cull from their then keep .
Sorry I just don’t see MP the footballer adding much to us going forward and I’m not convinced off field he ads a lot , in no way that means bad things , he just a very private family man.