Now that you've mentioned it, I agree. I've noticed this too often and I'll go high and call it racism.I'm convinced there is bias against Marlion. An unconscious bias, but a bias. Numerous times he is cited and fined for things that other AFL darlings would not be, and also penalties tend to be a bit harsher. Umps also quick on the whistle to pay frees against, and opposition players are allowed to be a little bit sloppy, like late hits that aren't paid 50 that Danger would get every time.
If you're Tom Hawkins you have a green light to collapse a players oesophagus with a punch in the throat. But he is a white private school boy, Marlion isn't.
It's all fun and games with Richmond. Get the popcorn out. I suppose neither Dimma or anyone at the club can speak out otherwise it's UMPIRE ABUSE!!What a disgraceful decision!!!
I think MRO is an acronym for Moronically Random Outcomes.
In despair at what our once great game has become, fancy getting cited for that,
yes what a disgrace , two players going tit or tat push push and only one gets fined and no mention of stagingWhat a disgraceful decision!!!
I think MRO is an acronym for Moronically Random Outcomes.
In despair at what our once great game has become, fancy getting cited for that,
If Butler has any character at all, he'd contact the MRO and tell them he staged.butler should be ashamed of himself ...........staging is a reportable act ......weak !
I'm convinced there is bias against Marlion. An unconscious bias, but a bias. Numerous times he is cited and fined for things that other AFL darlings would not be, and also penalties tend to be a bit harsher. Umps also quick on the whistle to pay frees against, and opposition players are allowed to be a little bit sloppy, like late hits that aren't paid 50 that Danger would get every time.
If you're Tom Hawkins you have a green light to collapse a players oesophagus with a punch in the throat. But he is a white private school boy, Marlion isn't.
And he'd offer to chip in for the fine.If Butler has any character at all, he'd contact the MRO and tell them he staged.
FFS, a push to the chest makes you stumble backwards, not collapse in a heap.
Yes, Pickett did the wrong thing, but he was provoked.Why are we blaming Bulter?
Why did PICKETT touch him in the first place.
Let's not cross wires here.
Pickett was in the wrong.
Pickett shouldve did the same when he was pushed by Bulter.Yes, Pickett did the wrong thing, but he was provoked.
As I said at the time, it's always the retaliator that gets pinged.
Butlers pleading with the umpire, staging and falling in a screaming heap are also issues, but the MRO/AFL has chosen to ignore these.
Pickett shouldve did the same when he was pushed by Bulter.
It was ok to see Bulter get similar free kicks for us but now it's the end of the world.
Pickett was in the wrong
Not sure that's going to happen, P&BHope he can get to 100 games we need his sons in Yellow & Black
The report said low impact, body contact…so not for the throat.Going by the vid.
Might be for the hit to Butlers throat and not the push.
If its for the push then geez alot of players will be out of pocket by years end.