I think the club would ideally do that, it seems there isn't any and as such Naismith is the best option available. I reckon he will acquit himself well as insurance provided he's injury free.would rather we grabbed some healthy 25 or 26
Legit I heard that.Perfect cover for one year and lines up with the acquisition of Darcy via Free Agency
On his last legs. Body is broken. They ran him into the ground. Shouldn’t have played that many games.Lycett played 14 games of AFL whats the deal with him
Naismith has played a total of 30 AFL games between 2014-2022 (9 seasons)I think the club would ideally do that, it seems there isn't any and as such Naismith is the best option available. I reckon he will acquit himself well as insurance provided he's injury free.
Me neither, hence the "injury free" comment. It's for one year as insurance on a minimum wage and demonstrated he played throughout the season in the vfl at a high standard. Naismith being the best available says more about his competition than he himself IMO.Not confident he’ll stand up to rigours of AFL
Had a knee reco in 21 after the 20 version didnt graft.Naismith has played a total of 30 AFL games between 2014-2022 (9 seasons)
In that time he’s had 3 knee reconstructions Not confident he’ll stand up to rigours of AFL
yep, Swans chose Naismith as their #1 ruck over Nank.I think I am right in saying that Naismith is probably the reason Nank left the swans.
He was picked in 2016 ahead of Nank and the swans played one ruck and Tippett as a ruck/forward
Ironic
That’s a major problem.Marking? He’s got NFI goes through many VFL games not taking a single mark
Should be a good insurance for us..Lets Just hope he doesn't Monkey around , But I'm a Believer
Just listen to the band!Should be a good insurance for us..Lets Just hope he doesn't Monkey around , But I'm a Believer
Naismith has played only 2 AFL games between 2018-2022