not concerned at all as they were a different knee each timeA Gunnedah boy
Was potentially an elite ruck when struck down with his first injury.
Not unhappy with his drafting although 3 knee reco's is a challenge for a big unit
Agree, short term play. Provides cover, physically ready right away, cheap.I like it as this is exactly what I believe you should be doing with your second ruck.
Better than Soldo and improving quickly. Was on way to being a gun ruck. Big and aggressive. Shame for his career.Agree, short term play. Provides cover, physically ready right away, cheap.
At his best was as good if not better than Soldo.
Scar tissue on his knees and in his lookalike.
Has he got 3 knees?not concerned at all as they were a different knee each time
So Lycett is still a chance for us?
No idea, my guess is the article is merely speculating.So Lycett is still a chance for us?
Good observation. 0 marks in 4 of his last 5 games of the season.He’s had 3 knee reconstructions …ouch
Played VFL for PtMelb in 2023 lots of hit outs but goes some games without taking a single mark
Left, right and kid kneeHas he got 3 knees?
He played 30 games. He really only played in 2016/2017. But he showed huge potential IMO.I'm in two minds about Naismith. Think I would prefer Lycett TBH. Naismith's VFL form has been good but his AFL stats arent as strong.
does anyone know what injury he copped in the VFL's round 11 that contributed to him missing a couple of games? Sammy Cougar? He'd played pre-season games and 10 straight VFL games before that in-game injury (in round 7 Port had the bye). Obviously he will be having all the medical stuff completed at RFC to ensure his knees are sound enough to get through a season of AFL footy. Id prefer him over Lycett personally; as id think if his knees are good and he got through a season of VFL footy without any issues with his knees; he'd be in a bit better nick than Lycett -whose last couple of years at the Power seemed injury riddled?. (18 AFL games; and not sure of SANFL games). As a back-up; Not too worried about his lack of marks at the back end of the VFL season; more happy to see that he gets his hands on the ball at centre-bounces and around the ground stoppages.I'm in two minds about Naismith. Think I would prefer Lycett TBH. Naismith's VFL form has been good but his AFL stats arent as strong.
What I have decided is that a mature age back-up is essential. Not only to compete at AFL level when Nank misses but also to provide decent ruck coverage to the VFL. If we want our young mids to develop they need decent ruck support at VFL level so whether it's Naismith, Lycett or someone else, they should get that.