RS? They must have run out of options
If Cumberland kicked 4 like he should of, he'd have got it.
Anyway, congrats Ralphy, building nicely.
RS? They must have run out of options
From the National Society Of Astronomers.What? From the AFL?
Are you sure?
We're owed 4 in a row.At last we get one.
Well done Hugo.
Ah, makes sense.From the National Society Of Astronomers.
This makes no sense other than…they are looking too close, pick a tiger cub
I thought his game was ordinary…. Great run, terrible finishing kick
it is weekly so the sponsor gets more value for money- that is the only reason.Well done Hugo, deserves some kudos, I'm a fan, but yeah, odd for that game. The whole structure of the award is loose and flawed IMO. Rules get tweaked so everyone gets a prize. For me, forget the nominations, throws up too many barriers. Why are they needed? If a young player plays a blinder the media are all over it, everyone loves it. Should be first year players U21 only, first year being the year you debut. Do it by player or coaches votes.
Reckon Raaalph's had overall just as good, if not a better season than Gibber but Gibber will be easily the better player of the two in the long run. Late in the season they often hand nominations to blokes that have put together a good years worth of work not just for one flash game. Bit hard to nominate a rising star in the week they don't play a game .It's a disgrace that Ralphsmith gets a nom before Air Gibcus. It's equally a disgrace that Ralphsmith gets a nom the same week that Cumberland was better than him