I am stunned that a punter has not issued a legal challenge on this decision. Amateur hour from the AFL with massive money riding on the highly dubious decision to reverse an official's call.
",,,what a horrible miss it was.'
You have such a chip on your shoulder about umpires, you turn into Homer Simpson as soon as they come up. You can run forward if you go back more than 5.
I just checked the channel 7 feed, he didn't stand back, the umpire calls play on.
The other thing I noticed from watching it again was just what a horrible miss it was. Such a simple shot.
All season long the commentators and media drone on and on whenever there is a close call on a score review "gee you just hope it doesn't decide a close final".
And yet here we are, it has decided a close game, it has ended our season, and I can hear the crickets.
If the AFL had any evidence that the right decision was made they would've given it to the media. Are the RFC just going to let them get away with it again?
We can complain all we like but the decision stood and cannot be changed now. That it was wrong is immaterial
Once an official review is taking place, the review centre controls exactly what viewers at home and at the ground can see. The broadcasters can only use the output being given to them by the review centre. It means there can be no confusion for fans.
I am stunned that a punter has not issued a legal challenge on this decision. Amateur hour from the AFL with massive money riding on the highly dubious decision to reverse an official's call.
",,,what a horrible miss it was.'
So confidently definitive among a world of uncertainty about this. You are either here just to wind suffering Tigers up or you are drinking your own bathwater. Which is it? Perhaps a little from Column A and a little from Column B.
So the Sam McClure article it is quoted from is incorrect?Unless that has changed since 2020 that is absolutely incorrect. I've seen it with my own eyes many times on two monitors side by side, one with the TV feed and one with the raw feed from the cameras.
So the Sam McClure article it is quoted from is incorrect?
Wrong. The umpire should not have been overturned. Tom did nothing wrong, stop blaming him.Whether or not he actually kicked a goal or a point, my point is it should never have got to a place where there was a question. He should have kicked it easily. Terrible miss (or close goal).
Wrong. The umpire should not have been overturned. Tom did nothing wrong, stop blaming him.
There are and will be many more shots at goal where there is a questionable outcome. There were at least 2 more that I saw on the weekend. Dress what the result was?
The AFL need to follow their own rules. Everytime.
Every comment in this thread would not have been made had the AFL done what they said they would do.
They are armature hour.
Or if Richmond were on the positive side of this decision/ledgerMore crickets today. Can you imagine if Collingwoods season was ended in this fashion?
Yep, footage from cameras a hundred n fifty metres up the ground is hardly gunna present a definitive result. One camera on each goal post phhht, I wonder which way the bloody thing is pointing.You know what annoys me as well, they keep calling this technology like its something revolutionary. Goal line technology in soccer is revolutionary. This isn't even technology.
Its a guy, watching the same tv cameras we've always had. What have the AFL spent on this, a few TV monitors and the wages of a couple of people. Seriously, the game requires and deserves a lot more.
This is the AFLs version of the NBN. Go cheap and you get a cheap result.
Yeh, there would be a bigger outrage.Or if Richmond were on the positive side of this decision/ledger
Dusty even had his jumper pulled and according to the commentators “that is an easy decision for the u pores to make”. Yeah rightThe frees to Hipwood and whoever got that joke of a holding free against Gibcus in the last. 'Soft' doesn't cut it.
Yet every time we went forward Lynch and Dusty were held.
WWEFL.