Umpire Abuse | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Umpire Abuse

Love it JJT - reads like a page from a Terry Pratchett novel!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user

AFL urged to invest in umpires as participation numbers dwindle at community level​

Posted 43m ago
An Australian rules football umpiring shortage is in danger of continuing because participation is "not keeping up with the growth of the game", according to a confidential AFL review obtained by ABC Sport.

Key points:​

  • An AFL review identified umpire numbers at the community level are dropping off
  • The workload facing umpires has increased in recent seasons
  • The review found women and girls represent only 11 per cent of umpire numbers
And umpire abuse in only a small part of the problem.
The strategy document from November 2021 reported the major reasons umpires were leaving the game included:
  • Work and study commitments (18 per cent)
  • Health/injury/age related (14 per cent)
  • Inadequate support/pay (13 per cent)
  • Lack of enjoyment (10 per cent)
Abuse, at 6 per cent, was eighth on the list.

AFL captains agreed the change was necessary.
"I think most clubs would've received it pretty well and understands how important they are to our game," Western Bulldogs captain Marcus Bontempelli said.
St Kilda skipper Jack Steele said umpires were vital to the game.
"The umpires are just as important as players, so we've got to respect that," he said.

Community umpires are grateful for the shift in attitude, while understanding there are bigger problems looming for the sport.
Under the headline "The shortage of umpires is now at crisis point", the AFL's review found COVID-19 devastated umpire recruitment.
"COVID has negatively impacted umpiring two-fold," the review report read.
"2020 saw the highest number of non-returning umpires on record [and] the lowest intake of new umpires in six years.

One in five umpires routinely carry the whistle more than one match per weekend. One in 10 oversee two or more matches.
"Some umpires are officiating up to seven matches per weekend," the report read.
"Excessive matches lead to an increased numbers of umpires leaving due to decreased enjoyment, injury, or burnout.
"A lack of qualified umpires increases volunteer load, impacts player safety, impacts enjoyment of the game."

The report's author Damian Anderson quit his position as community umpiring development manager last year.
Mr Anderson said the AFL needed to focus on recruitment if retention rates were "unchangeable".
"Acquisition should be the focus. A supercharged umpire acquisition strategy is required," he wrote in the report.
AFL umpire John Howorth coaches community-level whistle blowers in Melbourne's outer east.
Mr Howorth said he saw the shortage coming.
"Since COVID the numbers have reduced about 8 per cent," he said.
"But the level of football, particularly the [expansion] of women's football and the amount of junior grades, have gone up.
"The increase in football games and the amount of services umpires can provide has gone up but the number of umpires is slightly declining over the last two years."
Mr Howorth said some umpires controlled up to 90 match per season, a leading cause of burnout.
"I think the best thing we can do is provide a really inviting environment, particularly at training and match day," he said.
"It gives them confidence to go into their workplaces and their schools because of their experiences they've had as umpires."

Umpiring begins at grassroots level​

Junior football clubs are seen as the best source of new umpires.
The AFL's review found up to 94 per cent of umpires play or have played junior club football.
"Engaging junior clubs to assist in the recruitment of new umpires from their playing cohort goes direct to this source," the report read.
Mr Howorth said the AFL needed to promote the benefits of umpiring.
"Fitness is obviously one of them," he said.

Umpiring is seen by many young people as a good first job.
Teenagers can earn between $50 and $100 a match as field, boundary, or goal umpires.
"To increase new umpire conversion rates the AFL is required to invest in umpire participation in a similar way it does with other participation spaces (e.g. Auskick)," the report read.

Not enough females in umpiring​

The AFL review found girls and women were "severely under-represented within umpiring".
"To close the gap between the number of registered umpires and the number of required umpires, a greater number of female umpires must be engaged," the report read.
Girls and women represent only 11 per cent of umpires and have a much higher "non-return" rate than boys and men.
"A research project funded by the AFL Research Board in partnership with The University of Sydney investigated the experiences of females in umpiring," the report read.
"Findings indicate that there are systemic, institutional issues with supporting women and girls in umpiring, regardless of region or level, which negatively impact the experiences and numbers of females in umpiring.
"Report recommendations are required to be actioned to increase the number of females involved in umpiring and help address the overall umpire shortfall."


Someone else is seeing the bigger picture.. The AFL has to stop with the smokescreens & stump up the cash.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
As long as it is consistent, unfortunately it already appears to have "softened" in some instances. It's either zero tolerance or it isn't. eg Gold Coast player clearly remonstrated after a free to Cameron in the last quarter - no penalty. Why? Just another one open to an individual umpires tolerance levels.

There was nothing wrong with it previously, if a player carried on for too long or abused the umpire he got a 50. As TT pointed out we had the correct penalty available.

More angst for the spectator, more dislike for the umpire. Another PR failure for the AFL.
Individuals in a team, given an instruction by management all follow it differently depending on their personality. Referees or umpires have the same human problem. AFL umpiring would be the worst to officiate. Players are up with rule changes I'm sure there are meetings with umpire manager before the season to clarify questions from clubs. But the fans are out of the loop. Local league around here in NSW has 2 field umpires. No boundary and each club provides a goal umpire. Not sure what happens in Victoria. When my kid was playing basketball I got wrangled into refing. Only did for a year or two. But you do learn the rules. As far as abuse goes, I did yell at umps a bit..and one time got ejected by a bball ref who had a shocker. I remember every game was try and work out how they were going to ref it..
If No one wants to umpire, go back to the 70s. 1 field umpire.
The additional problem with Richmond is the consistent weight of frees against. The fact some fans try to keep tally of individual umpires free kicks against us. Deboy for example. Or other umps that hail from interstate. And complaining about bias. Which doesn't bother me, I'm not that bothered. When I watch Richmond play my focus is on us. Not the umpires not the opposition.
 
Last edited:
If No one wants to umpire, go back to the 70s. 1 field umpire.
When I umpired in th e early 80's in Melbourne it was all one umpire per game. You had to be really fit. I was a good runner-but only young-and I still remember the first training session. The coach just said "warm up, 10 laps" and I was like "smile" this is going to be a serios session if that's the warm up. It was brutal. Basically over two hours of different kinds of running. You did get paid to train though which was nice at that age. Not many lower level umps have that kind of fitness these days I reckon.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Noticed dissent shown after the weightman free (dodgy) at the end of the first - no 50. Zero tolerance?

Is this going to be one of those rules where the interpretation changes week to week and umpire to umpire ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
Noticed dissent shown after the weightman free (dodgy) at the end of the first - no 50. Zero tolerance?

Is this going to be one of those rules where the interpretation changes week to week and umpire to umpire ?

This . . . is the critical question.

Maintain it or don't bother. The minute they back off inconsistency is a given.

DS
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
This . . . is the critical question.

Maintain it or don't bother. The minute they back off inconsistency is a given.

DS
Yep, you cannot say zero tolerance and then have tolerance. And the tolerance level depends on what? Language? Body Language? The umpire?

There was no issue and now they've created one. I'm sure they will be tightening up on it starting tonight.
 

Watch, first Gawn takes his hands to his head and Smith puts his head down. Gawn quickly realises it could be 50 and stops and heads to Smith to ensure he doesn't say anything. To me it is nothing but didn't their body language express dissent with the decision? Or is it more they have to express disrespect to the umpire?

I'm glad it wasn't paid but will every umpire interpret it the same?

I hope common sense prevails.
 
Yep, you cannot say zero tolerance and then have tolerance. And the tolerance level depends on what? Language? Body Language? The umpire?

There was no issue and now they've created one. I'm sure they will be tightening up on it starting tonight.
The commentators picked up that you can query the umpire you just have to do it nicely. Like all new rules adjustments the interpretation and imposing of it will relax and by round 5 or so mainly the full blown tanties will get penalised (and the odd tiggy touchwood to keep us on our toes)
 
We should get the minority report folks involved. Can just give 50s against Richmond (and Toby Greene) before the Siren blows at the start of each quarter
 
FMD.
Did I just see 8 50s and cherra get 6 frees for *smile* all? He is the new afl darling.
Hope dimma does a Bevo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Soft frees come and go, reckon we got a couple ourselves tonight but not sure I saw a 50 that didn't have a stupid act behind it.

How many goals did we give away from 50s? 2? 3? In a 4 goal game.
They were all there, except maybe the Soldo one.

Only ourselves to blame. Soft.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Soft frees come and go, reckon we got a couple ourselves tonight but not sure I saw a 50 that didn't have a stupid act behind it.

How many goals did we give away from 50s? 2? 3? In a 4 goal game.
At least, and it needs to get a LOT better discipline wise no doubt. But the game is *smile* when it’s 50 mtrs and almost a certain goal for a foot moving 3 inches. God I hate the *smile* stand rule !
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6 users
At least, and it needs to get a LOT better discipline wise no doubt. But the game is *smile* when it’s 50 mtrs and almost a certain goal for a foot moving 3 inches. God I hate the *smile* stand rule !
I think the umpires hate it as much as most of us do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
As a club, we've shown the rule no respect, whinged about it at every opportunity and make it ok to keep transgressing it because it's a poor rule.

It's unprofessional and childish and symptomatic of our ongoing issue with discipline.

The contrast with Melbourne is chalk and cheese and so are the results.
And how does a rule moving a foot 3 inches on the mark help this game regardless ?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user