Umpire Abuse | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Umpire Abuse

can you possibly imagine a single kid watching this circus of rule changes etc has been inspired to take up umpiring???
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
How does that rule work ? was Soldo allowed to man the mark ? if so what direction should he have come from to do so ?
the ump told him not to go on the mark. there is a time allowed for someone to get to the mark, and he was after that time, didnt matter what direction he came from.

compared to other instances it appeared the ump was pretty quick to tell him to stay out, but he did. so the 50 was there.
 
Agree. Yeah this is yet another beef I have. The rule itself, if it is adjudicated and works as intended, already advantages the player with the ball. But that advantage is greatly increased by the adjudication being is tight as a fishes arse for the player on the mark, but loose as Granny Clampett's drawers for the player with the ball.

I don't blame the umps for this horrorshow at all.
except for when I think Graham marked the ball on our HFF, he turned around to look as was called play on. he may have gone off his line slightly, but it appeared pretty strict compared to what others do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Too many people crying over the rule changes. Wonder if the playing group are doing similar? Just deal with it and move on!
 
  • Love
Reactions: 1 user
It is an absolute shitshow. But like Putin in Ukraine, the AFL honchos can't can't or won't see it, won't back down and can't lose face.

To me the fundamental fabric of the game is fraying.
Frayed.
They had their chance to repeal this blight on our game this year but chose to go down with the ship.
Supporter satisfaction would be at an all time low.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Too many people crying over the rule changes. Wonder if the playing group are doing similar? Just deal with it and move on!
Or boycott the game and force change.
The supporters who actually pay the bills must be listened to
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
The in the back issue with tackles can be a technique problem, but I also remember a couple of tackles last year where the tackler grabs the player with the ball, the player with the ball attempts to flop forward, the tackler then tries to turn the player and gets pinged for a dangerous tackle.

As I said earlier, this is not easy to fix.

DS
 
Or boycott the game and force change.
The people who pay the bills must be listened to
AFL players can't boycott the game DA. Should only worry about what they CAN control.

As for the fans...well sure boycott if you feel that strongly. Still don't reckon that will force the change you want.
 
the ump told him not to go on the mark. there is a time allowed for someone to get to the mark, and he was after that time, didnt matter what direction he came from.

compared to other instances it appeared the ump was pretty quick to tell him to stay out, but he did. so the 50 was there.
OK, thanks Brodders, so thats explanation number 3. And TBR just offered his second so we have 4 all up.

Thanks everyone for clearing it up for me, I feel so much better about it now.:blowingup
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: 1 users
That's the same thing I'm saying, Bolton was the person the umpire had given time to either stand or leave, once that happens no other player can take the mark.
No its not actually. You'd be no good in a court of law biggie smalls.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
AFL players can't boycott the game DA. Should only worry about what they CAN control.

As for the fans...well sure boycott if you feel that strongly. Still don't reckon that will force the change you want.
Therein lies part of the problem.
It’s our game, not the AFL’s.
They’ve forgotten that as custodians of our game they are deputised to serve and protect. Not to destroy.
Worst rule ever bought in and, as Benny Gale said, totally unedifying to the spirit of our game.
I’m afraid they will lose thousands of supporters in their misguided quest to homogenise our game. Knowing them they’ll put it down to calculated collateral damage. Kids are turning to basketball and soccer. They’re propping up their participation numbers with females. Doesn’t tell the true picture at grass root level.
Now they’re trying to lose the parents.
In the meantime we debate these ridiculous new rules that we can’t possibly decipher rather than marvel at the beauty of the basics
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
This was an undisciplined effort. We didn’t lose because we are Richmond and the umpires hate us.

We lost because we take no care in understanding or playing within the existent rules.

Jack Graham needs to have his backside kicked. Mouthed off - OK - in the heat of the moment that can happen. Take your lumps and move on. But to then run and deliberately get in the protected zone is ridiculous, inexcusable.

That aside, there are issues with the rules as they are being applied.

A player stands the mark at a specific and exact point as directed and forced by the controlling umpire. The player with the ball however is allowed to stand 5 metres to the left or right of that point with out any reference to that exact mark.
If you are going to have a stand rule should not the player with the ball be always required to start in a direct line with that point? There is already a laughable advantage given to the player with the ball in the delay between them moving off the position they have taken and the umpire reacting and calling play on.
They are anally fixated on the mark when kicking for goal why not apply it everywhere and all the time?

A player flopping like Matthew Lloyd when tackled should not be rewarded with a prohibited contact push in the back free kick. The rules - AFL Resources - state that prohibited contact occurs when a player pushes or bumps an opposition player in the back. We saw this at least twice last night where the umpire placed their own subjective interpretation on this rule. The rule is clear - a push or a bump. The player was tackled fairly within the rules - no push, no bump - then collapsed deliberately taking the tackler for a ride to the ground. Play on or holding the ball.

I get the desire for no umpire abuse. However, just because you have a whistle doesn’t mean you are deserving of respect. Do your job properly and earn it.
Good points but here is a novel idea...*smile* it off and we don't have to have these debates after every bloody game because of a sh!t, big time grey area rule !

As I'm sure all other supporters of other teams will be having every week as well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Too many people crying over the rule changes. Wonder if the playing group are doing similar? Just deal with it and move on!
No, better idea...*smile* it off !

Its a terrible rule that add's NOTHING but confusion to the game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
City Hall madness.
Gilquarters gone mad.
Introduce enough rules and you can blatantly cheat using the various vague, ambiguous interpretations.
Pretty soon the players will need to be accountants and mathematicians to play.
Going out with their set squares and compasses to assess all the angles of where they can and can't run.
Can and can't stand.
And of course muzzles as to not offend the whistlers.
I think Optimus was on the mark at one stage with the ump right next to him about 30 out from Goal.
I said to my mate (as if speaking to Dylan):
Mouth shut, look straight ahead, don't scratch yourself, don't look at the scoreboard, don't look at the fans, don't fart, don't breathe.
Eff me.
They have almost made this game unwatchable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
can you possibly imagine a single kid watching this circus of rule changes etc has been inspired to take up umpiring???
This. The ongoing rule changes and how confusing it’s made everything for everyone, umpires included, is doing more to turn people away from umpiring, than any other external factors.
 
Cerra is a cheating piece of *smile* and the umps are too stupid to see him flopping. That and Ross horrible turnovers in the 4th qtr cost us the game
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Cerra is a cheating piece of *smile* and the umps are too stupid to see him flopping. That and Ross horrible turnovers in the 4th qtr cost us the game
5 in the backs Kong.
That's on Selwood pace.
He was flopping and the dumb pricks kept on paying them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
5 in the backs Kong.
That's on Selwood pace.
He was flopping and the dumb pricks kept on paying them.
Its because it appears to be one of the most clear cut free kicks to pay. Hopefully the club makes a formal complaint and the cheating little mummy's boy doesn't get another one all year
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user