Smoking Aces said:Hypithetical BH, if you had the choice of Lennon or Adams who would you choose?
It is a hypothetical because my gut feeling is Lennon will go in the top ten, he's come home like a freight train and I believe allayed many fears about his ability to play midfield. After the u/18 carnival I was suitably impressed with his potential as a classy strong marking forward, his kicking would already place him amongst the most penetrating and accurate in the league. He's particularly agile as well, so will be a hard man to nail down when he gets hold of the pill. But back to his kicking, if eventually Lennon finds his way down back, he will be the ideal zone buster, something which will have the opposition second guessing. That's not to say I see him primarily as a back flanker, his last month of TAC football was top shelf and the numbers were befitting of a player with a severe case of leather poisoning. In his first final he racked up a lazy 25 touches and kicked three goals, the game before it was 37 touches and a goal, the week before it was 28 and 2 majors. Dare I say it but one could even call it Dustin Martin like, but unlike Martin, Lennon appears to revel on the big stage (sorry Dusty but you deserved that).
So back to the original question, would I prefer Adams? I'm going to sit on the fence a little longer and wait for the endurance numbers to come through. If Lennon has a decent tank to match all his other fine attributes, then he gets my vote. Classy goal kicking midfielders are a rare commodity, and at Richmond, he would be icing on the cake.
Tigerdog said:Cheers for your views BH, always a good read.
Thoughts on Kennedy-Harris?
He's one I've bookmarked pending draft camp results. He's quick, skilled, has leadership credentials and represents something we sorely miss, that is a tenacious whippet who can manufacture goals from scraps and spillages. His disposal numbers aren't huge against quality opposition but he does have hurt factor. And despite his small frame he's not afraid to get his hands dirty. I think if he's still around by our second pick he could be worth a look - provided he has decent aerobic capacity. In saying that, I'd prefer we took the punt on Garlett who has already shown he can already dominate against the big boys.