(thinks to self - why am I about to wade into this??? I don't know, but I feel I must)
I'm with you hopper.
The strong reaction to these reports are typical of the frenzy the tabloid media like to whip up around us for their own financial gains and in same cases, personal power (like that idiot shock jock in Sydney I'm not going to name and give publicity to). The HS just don't care about facts - I know this from experience. when a story doesn't even come close to what you thought it was going to be, but is worded in a factless, misleading and sensational way it can be quite confronting. Today Tonight? Please! you can't even beleive what you see on this trash given how they edit what is finally aired to the public. As a quick aside, I really love parodies of this type of media: the show "Rock Bottom" on The Simpsons (and subsequent talk shows) is just great at showing how quickly people get on the anger bandwagon when they don't even know what happened "your tears say more than real evidence ever could!". Then of course Frontline was great - watch it if you're too young to remember it. Even though it's a comedy, it makes you think. Did any of you ever see John Safran expose how when ACA (when Ray Martin was host) savaged the Paxton kids and made them look like complete no hopers simply by taking them slightly out of context and cutting pertinent details? It's amazing how some minor tweaking to a story can completley change our perception of what really happens. Viva la Media Watch.
To continue my siding with Hopper, to aim such red hot anger at an 8 year old when we just don't know the facts (even when we DO know the facts) is very disturbing to me. VERY disturbing. I'm glad of all the posters in this thread that Hopper is the one in the right place. Thank God the rest of you aren't in a position to directly screw up the lives of a large number of kids. Like Hopper, I am NOT saying Tyler and his family haven't been traumatised. Nor am I saying the Principal did anything right or wrong - becuase I just don't trust what I see from these media outlets and I wish this type of 'journalism' was banned. Even if it was all true, do you really beleive this is the way an 8 year old should be handled? Really? That saddens me greatly. IT's not about being a bleeding heart either. This is a child we are talking about for goodness sake. A young mind in very early development stage, testing the waters of the world it is in not knowing much about anything. Do we give that develping mind a slap and chuck it the corner, or do we show it how to treat people with kindness? Do you know why this child bullied Tyler? Of course you don't. IT could be a very lonely child who got some attention by finding 'the right target'. IT could be a child with mild autism not yet dignosed. Yeah, maybe the kid is just a little brat, but shouldn't we DEMONSTRATING how to behave with respect to others?
I have seen a suspected so called 'bully' reduced to heart wrenching terrified tears becuase an adult who should have been the one using a thoughtful measured approached acted on instinct and took matters inappropriately into their own hands. This is a tragic mistake. And facts do back up clearly identifying anger, violence and retrobution as being detrimental and the wrong way to handle this issue. Violence breeds violence. Kids will learn this as their problem solving tool. The less it's used, the less it will be used.
Those of you who think bullying the bully will work are wrong.
I'm with you hopper.
The strong reaction to these reports are typical of the frenzy the tabloid media like to whip up around us for their own financial gains and in same cases, personal power (like that idiot shock jock in Sydney I'm not going to name and give publicity to). The HS just don't care about facts - I know this from experience. when a story doesn't even come close to what you thought it was going to be, but is worded in a factless, misleading and sensational way it can be quite confronting. Today Tonight? Please! you can't even beleive what you see on this trash given how they edit what is finally aired to the public. As a quick aside, I really love parodies of this type of media: the show "Rock Bottom" on The Simpsons (and subsequent talk shows) is just great at showing how quickly people get on the anger bandwagon when they don't even know what happened "your tears say more than real evidence ever could!". Then of course Frontline was great - watch it if you're too young to remember it. Even though it's a comedy, it makes you think. Did any of you ever see John Safran expose how when ACA (when Ray Martin was host) savaged the Paxton kids and made them look like complete no hopers simply by taking them slightly out of context and cutting pertinent details? It's amazing how some minor tweaking to a story can completley change our perception of what really happens. Viva la Media Watch.
To continue my siding with Hopper, to aim such red hot anger at an 8 year old when we just don't know the facts (even when we DO know the facts) is very disturbing to me. VERY disturbing. I'm glad of all the posters in this thread that Hopper is the one in the right place. Thank God the rest of you aren't in a position to directly screw up the lives of a large number of kids. Like Hopper, I am NOT saying Tyler and his family haven't been traumatised. Nor am I saying the Principal did anything right or wrong - becuase I just don't trust what I see from these media outlets and I wish this type of 'journalism' was banned. Even if it was all true, do you really beleive this is the way an 8 year old should be handled? Really? That saddens me greatly. IT's not about being a bleeding heart either. This is a child we are talking about for goodness sake. A young mind in very early development stage, testing the waters of the world it is in not knowing much about anything. Do we give that develping mind a slap and chuck it the corner, or do we show it how to treat people with kindness? Do you know why this child bullied Tyler? Of course you don't. IT could be a very lonely child who got some attention by finding 'the right target'. IT could be a child with mild autism not yet dignosed. Yeah, maybe the kid is just a little brat, but shouldn't we DEMONSTRATING how to behave with respect to others?
I have seen a suspected so called 'bully' reduced to heart wrenching terrified tears becuase an adult who should have been the one using a thoughtful measured approached acted on instinct and took matters inappropriately into their own hands. This is a tragic mistake. And facts do back up clearly identifying anger, violence and retrobution as being detrimental and the wrong way to handle this issue. Violence breeds violence. Kids will learn this as their problem solving tool. The less it's used, the less it will be used.
Those of you who think bullying the bully will work are wrong.