I agree. I don’t believe it was from years out because 1. A change of coach was possible 2. We didn’t have the trade capital with a few retirees. 3. Unknown that Adolfo was going to get “nudged” last year. With a few of those picks getting traded into this years. Only useful mainly for points picks. Bit it worked out okI think he targeted this draft by trading forward into it from last year. We only 2 middling picks last year (McAuliffe and Fawcett) and were happy to trade back to get extra picks in this draft.
Yes quite possible.You misunderstand my point on Bolton. In terms of timing I didn't mean 2 years ago when he re-signed. We heard from Blair that he was always interested in wanting to go back, interesting then that the year that he requested to go back, the WA teams (both of them) had the currency to make the trade work. Whether you think that was Bolton and his management that made that call, or Blair had the discussion with Shai to sort of say, "look, we know you've wanted to head back to WA at some point, we feel this year is the best year where we can get a win-win for both you and for the club, are you interested".
AgreedThat part I think could conceivably have occurred and he would have had some inkling that both Baker and Graham would take a look elsewhere, as I said previously, I reckon the only 1 that probably took Blair and the club by surprise was Rioli which is why we played hardball on that trade, more so than the others.
I agree with just about all of that. There’s a fair bit of supposition, but regardless of how we got there, Blair dealt as well as he could.Not saying Graham or Baker were targets of Blairs, but contingencies would have been strewn up in that if he goes, we would want it to work for us in the draft that we'd like. Baker in particular, it would be interesting to know from the club whether it was them of Bakes that wanted his contract to expire 1 year before free agency. That must have been planned, otherwise why not take the extra year to free agency and then exercise his right to leave at that point?
As we found out later, under some very difficult and emotional stress.
Anyone worth his salt would have contingency plans drawn up. For drafts, trades, FAs, our own players, contracts, injuries, premature retirements, and many other variables we don’t even think about.
Sometimes rules are changed, which then makes your game plan obsolete. Which happened. Nothing could be done at the time, but we still failed to adjust our game plan.The playing personnel couldn’t be changed overnight but I think we were too slow to react to any changes.
I’ve stated we’ve had hits and misses like all clubs, but the last couple of years we’ve fallen well behind. That’s obvious.
At least with a healthy hand of draft picks, a TPP that’s in good order (well fairly low atm) means our important players can be re-signed and even front ended.
I’m stating the obvious but this draft especially and next year are crucial to our future. We’ve got to nail this draft. I’m not sure of the strength of next years but no doubt there will be good players there.
Fingers crossed.