Absolutely correct.As I understand it picks can be traded up to and including the day of the draft so there is no need for any concern about that.
Is that correct ?
Absolutely correct.As I understand it picks can be traded up to and including the day of the draft so there is no need for any concern about that.
Is that correct ?
Surely not. Bruest was a terrific forward but was is the key word . His best is behind himFrom Cal Twomey.
Just like their interest in Chad Wingard, Greater Western Sydney has explored interest in Luke Breust over the last day. Would similarly have been willing to use pick 13 in a deal, but like Wingard, Breust has been reluctant to move from Hawks. More on
@traderadio
@AFLcomau
.
Honestly, Pick 13 for someone who is a good player but is about to turn 31.
Agree Sin. GWS obviously think they are close to a flag - which is prob true TBH - so what's another early pick to give away. pick 13 for a player with 1-2 years left at most.Surely not. Bruest was a terrific forward but was is the key word . His best is behind him
Might explain itThe Breust offer would in all likelihood be Bruest + #21 for Pick #13.
Pick #13 is just for the headline.
GWS having another crack at an elimination final.Might explain it
Blowed if I could see how he was worth 13
Ok that might help explain it. B/c 13 on its own seems overs.The Breust offer would in all likelihood be Bruest + #21 for Pick #13.
Pick #13 is just for the headline.
How dare GWS rob Dudodoro and the Druggies of their annual trade period premiership!Ok that might help explain it. B/c 13 on its own seems overs.
Anyway, supposedly not happening.
I just also heard GWS rejected the Bombers offer of a F2 for Hill.
or let them down ...Lol.
McCartney has no intention of cooperating with Dodoro. He is just going to kick his tyres.
The Breust offer would in all likelihood be Bruest + #21 for Pick #13.
Pick #13 is just for the headline.
Not sure about that. We were last for clearances this year per opposition and either 2nd last or last in the previous 3 seasons, that's 4 years in a row. I don't think Soldo will be as a bigger influence as some seem to make out. Our game was always to give up the first clearance if necessary and pressure the secondary receiver and push forward hard on the rebound. The rule changes for 2021 absolutely smashed our game plan and the players we've recruited for that game plan. I don't see having both Nanks and Soldo as lumbering type ruckmen necessarily being an advantage at all.I think you will find losing Soldo played a major part in our dysfunctional midfield.
Yep. Until the system adjusts to the new reality of the reduced salary cap there will be less moves because few have cap space. That is going to take a while until contracts signed before the cap reduction are mostly finished.Zzzzzzzz
If this trade period is not enough to end Gilligans reign for good then don't know what willThe stand rule has been adopted for trading
Did Blair convince North that it was OK to give up their future 2nd for CCJ because they would be able to get StKilda’s future second for Xerri or did they just come up with it all on their own?Reckon the Roos will look stupid with Xerri.
They want a future 2nd involved , most probably what will happen, is he doesn't play a lot in 2022. Is out of contract, traded next year to the Saints for like Pick 60.