The evidence doesn't back it up that playing two rucks helps us run out games Carts.
Soldo has missed three games - In those we ran over the top of the Dogs, Beat Adelaide in the second half, whilst Melbourne ground us down without us being blown out (you could argue on class alone)
The big and costly second half wipeouts after leading - Carlton, St Kilda, Sydney then even letting Hawthorn and Essendon back in - All occured with Soldo as second ruck. Co-incidence much?
Leysy does agree a decent second ruck against Melbourne would be ideal and should be considered. But is the bigger risk to us the Dees power running through the middle. Not keeping our guys through the middle as fresh as possible to match that could be equally as risky.
That match-up (along with St Kilda) is certainly up for discussion, but no other teams are running two genuine rucks for us to worry about.
And those two clubs only get by with two rucks because all of them are equally as good forward. The anti-Soldo. Our guys don't have that capability.
We don't have the luxury of playing a guy averaging 60 odd minutes TOG, 7.1 possessions and 2.2 marks a game, when we are getting run over needs to change.
All evidence says getting say Dow in as another runner to make a real difference keeping our midfield/runners fresh all match should be explored.