Re: PSD pick 2?
No where did i say that you cant use high draft picks on talls, if u can be bothered reading what i said was
Talls more so than other players can develop at different rates taking a few with these picks (Late ND,PSD and Rookie) gives u every chance you can stumble upon diamonds in the rough.
So yes sure talls with quality use the high picks if u feel they justify it. However keep looking for the one who develops late that wont cost you anything to draft.
GoodOne said:If that's the case then the Tigers have it all upside down last couple of drafts we're we've used Pick1 and 2 last year and picks 2 and 3 this year on talls. We should have not recruited any and just left them for the late and rookie drafts. Obviously that is folly. I am very happy that we have used high picks for talls over the last 3 seasons or so. Very glad. The argument of some is that we should we should be drafting a few more at the lower picks to address our obvious lack of mature, quality talls. A little like the loading of midfielders from 2004 where we had a massive deficiency. No-one was saying in 2004 that we should be drafting flankers instead of midfielders because we are deficient in them too. Why? Because the midfielders are of most importance. Second come the KPPs. Flankers can be found alot easier.
Overall, pretty happy with the progress but desperately need to address all our key positions and ensure we have insurance for any that fail to mature and make it.
No where did i say that you cant use high draft picks on talls, if u can be bothered reading what i said was
Talls more so than other players can develop at different rates taking a few with these picks (Late ND,PSD and Rookie) gives u every chance you can stumble upon diamonds in the rough.
So yes sure talls with quality use the high picks if u feel they justify it. However keep looking for the one who develops late that wont cost you anything to draft.