-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
The Brownlow (Merged)
- Thread starter Phar Ace
- Start date
Re: Who will win the Brownlow?
Swans were winning though, even early in the year, and their team is so even across the 22 that the winner will still command 3 + 1 or 2 +1 as a general rule - and Goodes is still so visible even in an ordinary game - I think his shot is better that perhaps you might think as he doesn't have the visible competition.
Pendles, Swan and Thomas will split votes regularly. Judd, Murphy and occasionally Gibbs will split votes. Someone from Geelong could be a dark horse - a Chapman perhaps because of the even spread theory again. If Kelly's season had been a little more dominant he might even have come from nowhere.
I agree with Judd as favourite, but Murphy has had a much improved year.
GoodOne said:
Swans were winning though, even early in the year, and their team is so even across the 22 that the winner will still command 3 + 1 or 2 +1 as a general rule - and Goodes is still so visible even in an ordinary game - I think his shot is better that perhaps you might think as he doesn't have the visible competition.
Pendles, Swan and Thomas will split votes regularly. Judd, Murphy and occasionally Gibbs will split votes. Someone from Geelong could be a dark horse - a Chapman perhaps because of the even spread theory again. If Kelly's season had been a little more dominant he might even have come from nowhere.
I agree with Judd as favourite, but Murphy has had a much improved year.
Re: Who will win the Brownlow?
:rofl :rofl
An being monosyllabic, Judd sounds remarkable like 'ruff' to a seeing eye dog. (though Roughhead could go close some year if an unpire has a dog with a stutter.
Baloo said:
:rofl :rofl
An being monosyllabic, Judd sounds remarkable like 'ruff' to a seeing eye dog. (though Roughhead could go close some year if an unpire has a dog with a stutter.
Re: Who will win the Brownlow?
?? Swans were 4 wins and 3 losses and a draw after 8 games. O'Keefe and Kennedy were killing it early on and all the talk was about how inconsistently Goodes was playing. I'd be surprised actually if Goodes finishes above O'Keefe, O'Keefe had a very good year.
Phar Ace said:
?? Swans were 4 wins and 3 losses and a draw after 8 games. O'Keefe and Kennedy were killing it early on and all the talk was about how inconsistently Goodes was playing. I'd be surprised actually if Goodes finishes above O'Keefe, O'Keefe had a very good year.
Re: Who will win the Brownlow?
Not talking your fantasies here Zips - it's the Brownlow Medal ;D
zippadeee said:
Not talking your fantasies here Zips - it's the Brownlow Medal ;D
Re: Who will win the Brownlow?
Umpires love Goodes almost as much as they love Judd. The only players who've polled more votes in the past four years are Judd and Ablett. Goodes' b&f finishes: 4th, unplaced (not in top 10), 5th, 6th. Ablett's gone 1-2-1-2, Judd 6-1-1-1.
GoodOne said:
Umpires love Goodes almost as much as they love Judd. The only players who've polled more votes in the past four years are Judd and Ablett. Goodes' b&f finishes: 4th, unplaced (not in top 10), 5th, 6th. Ablett's gone 1-2-1-2, Judd 6-1-1-1.
<
Jack Gunston
|
Granny poll
>
