LeeToRainesToRoach said:He got 3's in losses by 57, 50 and 9 points. Only Nathan Buckley with 4 x 3's in losing sides in 1998 has had more since 1984.
If records were complete, I'm sure they'd show players like Skilton regularly polled 3's in losses.
rimau35 said:I have no problems with a player from a side being thrashed picking up one or two votes but 3 votes?
Tigerdog said:How long before the Brownlow starts is it that the AFL pre-count the votes and know the result?
An hour? A day? A week?
tigerdave said:You still can't tell me that the 3 umpires in each game ALL agree on the same 3,2 and 1.The umpire's should individually cast their own 3,2, and 1 votes.The vote count would be higher, but who cares.
And all the Crap at the start of the count focusing on Judd and Goodes winning a 3rd medal.Well that came back and bit them on the Arse didn't it?It's not all about those two.
Well done to Swanny though. :clap
Ty Esler said:I would love a Dusty acceptance speach where he gives a don't argue on the way to the podium!
23.21.159 said:Always thought this too. It would also give a better spread and a fairer result. If a bloke dominates a game, he could get 9. On the other hand, if it's an even spread, you could wind up with 9 different players getting no more than 3 each.
rokin.tiger said:Although wouldn't mind him giving the dont argue to bruce mcfairy.
Wasn't that system used for a few years? Maybe only with 2 umpires.tigerdave said:You still can't tell me that the 3 umpires in each game ALL agree on the same 3,2 and 1.The umpire's should individually cast their own 3,2, and 1 votes.The vote count would be higher, but who cares.
YinnarTiger said:Wasn't that system used for a few years? Maybe only with 2 umpires.