looks good, could we package our next year's first rounder and a second round this year swap for a under 10 pick? Not knowing who who's in this draft, but reports (not sure how true), there is a wealth of talent in this year.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
The Blair "Which?" Project
- Thread starter Tony Braxton-Hicks
- Start date
OUT:
CCJ
IN:
Tarrant + 38
Then it doesn't impact the Chol compo - lets say its 39-ish.
We can then package a combination of 38, 39, 40, 44 to the Western Bulldogs which nets us 17.
17 = 1,025 points
38, 39, 40, 44 = 1,702 points
That would net the Doggies pick #28 after they match their Darcy bid. So in theory, we could also get a future pick in that deal.
Overall its...
OUT:
CCJ
IN:
Tarrant + #17 or #18
Then head to the draft with 7, 15, 17, 26, 28.
I see that as a worse case scenario really as the initial CCJ could be better - never know.
CCJ
IN:
Tarrant + 38
Then it doesn't impact the Chol compo - lets say its 39-ish.
We can then package a combination of 38, 39, 40, 44 to the Western Bulldogs which nets us 17.
17 = 1,025 points
38, 39, 40, 44 = 1,702 points
That would net the Doggies pick #28 after they match their Darcy bid. So in theory, we could also get a future pick in that deal.
Overall its...
OUT:
CCJ
IN:
Tarrant + #17 or #18
Then head to the draft with 7, 15, 17, 26, 28.
I see that as a worse case scenario really as the initial CCJ could be better - never know.
Agree totally, should never trade a future first in my opinion. Pies a great lesson giving away this years pick 2
Usually agree with not trading a future first, but this year l think it has merit. Especially if we believe we can make top 4 next year, which would make the pick 15 to 18 before bids.
Saints may be open to trading their pick 9 this year if they are keen on getting King from Gold Coast, they would need at least two firsts.
Add the 9 to our current picks and you can get 6 young players with talent coming through together.
Saints may be open to trading their pick 9 this year if they are keen on getting King from Gold Coast, they would need at least two firsts.
Add the 9 to our current picks and you can get 6 young players with talent coming through together.
Would rather demand pick 20 for CJ and forgoe the Chol compo pick.
I'll take your word for it, 'cause I only half get what you're talking about but....................I LIKE IT!
Can't really "demand" anything when NM hold all the power with the PSD unfortunately.
I'd be more inclined to trade out some of our later picks for an extra pick next year.
For instance, if we did end up with 38, 39, 40 and 44, that would be the equivalent of pick 7. Give that to Colonwood for Daicos in exchange for next year's first, and next year laugh as we end up with pick 1. (We can even keep 44 to give to the Cats for the Lurkle trade, and have points equivalent of pick 11 with 38-40.)
We'd still have 7, 15, 26 and 28 to use this year, plus Tarrant and Lurke, and two first-rounders next year.
Hmmmm
Short Tarrant grimes
Vlastuin Talia Edwards
Broad Mcintosh Pickett
Dusty. Balta Cotchin
Riewoldt Lynch stack
Soldo Ross Bolton
Nankervis Prestia Lambert graham
baker Rioli caddy castagna
Plus a good few months of rest and relaxation before the pre-season
We are back in premiership mode
Last edited:
Nice!
But honestly can't see the pies trading away their first, it'd be repeating the same mistake twice.
They do need points, so trade some for their 2022 2nd. Every chance that is pick 19 or 20
INTEREST BUILDS IN SUNS' PICK
RICHMOND and Adelaide are among the clubs interested in Gold Coast's pick No.3 with the Suns open to splitting the selection for multiple top picks.The Suns inquired about trading up to pick No.1 with North Melbourne listening to offers, but the Roos are strongly tipped to hold the selection with South Adelaide teenager Jason Horne-Francis in their sights.
As reported in Inside Trading earlier this month, the Suns are open to trading their top-three pick for two early selections, which has seen the Tigers show interest. Richmond is well placed to make a move up the board with picks 7, 15, 26 and 28 inside the top 30.
The Tigers could package multiple selections to jump up the order, with future picks also an option at their disposal.
The Crows hold pick No.4 at the draft but that will be bumped back to No.6 after bids on father-son pair Nick Daicos and Sam Darcy and they have also shown interest in potentially edging up the board. Adelaide also holds pick 23 but will also be looking to negotiate a trade with Sydney for Jordan Dawson.
Finn Callaghan, Ben Hobbs and Josh Ward are all midfield options pressing to be top-six draft picks, while Josh Gibcus and Mac Andrew are the tall options in the mix outside of Darcy.
Any pick swap deal at the top end could come much closer to November's NAB AFL Draft, however, with clubs able to swap selections up until a week before the event – and then again during the draft. - Callum Twomey
I saw that article and it was promising.
But if JHF is off the table should we go pick 3, is it really worth it? Is it worth missing out on 2 players in the next tier?
I noted that Stack was also likely to re-sign, but the three talls were still "uncontracted"
I tend to agree. Unless there’s a chance for Horne-Francis or unless we really rate Callaghan, it doesn’t seem there’s a sufficient difference in those next rung of players to warrant using the draft capital in that way.
Maybe GCS see it the same way with their pick 3.
Wonder if Richmond will try and push hard on the CCJ deal with North to try and use that to package up a deal with GCS for pick 3.
GCS don't have too many spots left to fill on their list and have Academy players they may be even able to pre-list (depends what the AFL rules on that) or match.
GCS also have pick 19 (?) & 22. Got a feeling they may also prefer future picks. Our Pick 15 (or North's pick 20) + a future pick for pick 3? Target Collingwood's future second round with our later picks as they need the points = So could be 15 + Collingwood's future second round + maybe another future pick . Could also swap 26 or 28 for a future pick off a team.
Would still give us 3, 7, 15/20 (depending on CCJ), 26, 28(?)
