Is it nonchalance or diffidence?Quite possibly LD, but he is also timid.
Is it nonchalance or diffidence?Quite possibly LD, but he is also timid.
Are we talking about Miller, Samson or both?It's simple. he has no overhead game whether that be marking spoiling or holding ground.
Pre requisite for his role.
Reckon Ryan can get there when he fills outAre we talking about Miller, Samson or both?
Do you think both Brown and Koschitzke will still play.Totally agree Brodders. There is no way that we go through a pre-season with a plan, train players in certain positions, and then throw it away due to 2 poor quarters of footy (we started and ended the game well enough).
I think your team is pretty much how I expect it to go aswell.
It was always likely to be either brown or Grimes (if fit) that plays opening round. I'm not sure Grimes can play both, I'd personally have Brown playing on the GC so Grimes is cherry ripe for the Carlton game as I think he's needed more for their forward mix but I think Yze will go for Grimes on the GC.
I think Green will play but thats the 1 role thats a bit uncertain, only had 28% TOG%.
Someone mentioned maybe Grimes and Gibcus swap between rd 0 and 1 so neither play the short break. That is possibly a good option.Totally agree Brodders. There is no way that we go through a pre-season with a plan, train players in certain positions, and then throw it away due to 2 poor quarters of footy (we started and ended the game well enough).
I think your team is pretty much how I expect it to go aswell.
It was always likely to be either brown or Grimes (if fit) that plays opening round. I'm not sure Grimes can play both, I'd personally have Brown playing on the GC so Grimes is cherry ripe for the Carlton game as I think he's needed more for their forward mix but I think Yze will go for Grimes on the GC.
I think Green will play but thats the 1 role thats a bit uncertain, only had 28% TOG%.
Do you think both Brown and Koschitzke will still play.
Collingwood are the benchmark. Don’t think either did enough.
Someone mentioned maybe Grimes and Gibcus swap between rd 0 and 1 so neither play the short break. That is possibly a good option.
B Grimes Young Gibcus
HB Short Flossy Brown
C Ross Prestia D. Rioli
HF Baker Bolton Taranto
F Broad Balta Cumberland
R Naismith Dow Martin
IC Pickett Hopper McAuliffe Nank/Kosi
Sub Lefau
And he's got Broad in a forward pocket.Look Out - Lamby's back!!
yeah, thats probably our best 22 available.I suspect Yze will go for something like the below, however IMO it's not the right balance and the midfield and fwd line is too slow.
vlastuin....young....broad
short....gibcus....rioli
pickett....taranto....mcintosh
baker....balta....campbell
bolton...kosi...martin
naismith....dow....hopper
grimes....nank....ross...prestia
The balance isn’t quite right. You can say that again. McIntosh and Koschitzke are not the answer.yeah, thats probably our best 22 available.
and yeah, the balance probably isnt quite right.
I think that's pretty close. I'm not sure Nank will be fit, so I reckon they bring Ryan or Miller in. Maybe Green as sub.I suspect Yze will go for something like the below, however IMO it's not the right balance and the midfield and fwd line is too slow.
vlastuin....young....broad
short....gibcus....rioli
pickett....taranto....mcintosh
baker....balta....campbell
bolton...kosi...martin
naismith....dow....hopper
grimes....nank....ross...prestia
Agree. Just not on Clarke, hasn't done anything worth the promo imo.Feels like sacrilege but despite being solid last time out, I'm not sure Grimey is in my team now with Gibcus looking ready to play.
Broad & Vlastuin squeeze him out & rather get some more leg speed or midfield strength on the bench like Clarke, Green or McAuliffe.
I reckon we will go at 4 talls- rucks and KPFs.Will they play Ryan if Nank doesn’t get up
or go balta as the second ruck option