I doubt you even read David’s postYou wouldn't think it would be that hard, would you.
But here we are...
You’d only be replying by who it’s addressed to.
I doubt you even read David’s postYou wouldn't think it would be that hard, would you.
But here we are...
Yeah, seven years laterHaha, Willo really believes that no-one knew that states would challenge Roe v Wade when the numbers on the Supreme Court were tipped in favour of the anti-choice lobby.
He also seems to think you have to be Nostradamus to predict how potential judges would vote on a case when brought.
Priceless that you don’t know SCOTUS judges aren’t appointed by the President. Oh that’s right you do know that, but in this case Trump appointed them all.Yes, along with everyone else with an IQ higher than their shoe size, Trump knew certain states would bring a case and try to get it to the Supreme Court and he knew (because he appointed them) how the new judges would rule on a case to overturn Roe v Wade.
Yes your ignorance knows no equal. You admit to the process, the dismiss it because it doesn’t suit your opinion. Even when you know you knowingly know you’re wrong.As I said: priceless.
DS
It's true DS, nobody knew.Haha, Willo really believes that no-one knew that states would challenge Roe v Wade when the numbers on the Supreme Court were tipped in favour of the anti-choice lobby.
He also seems to think you have to be Nostradamus to predict how potential judges would vote on a case when brought.
Yes, along with everyone else with an IQ higher than their shoe size, Trump knew certain states would bring a case and try to get it to the Supreme Court and he knew (because he appointed them) how the new judges would rule on a case to overturn Roe v Wade.
As I said: priceless.
DS
No doubt you all knew 5It's true DS, nobody knew.
Apologies Willo, while I was still posting on this thread, I hadn't mentioned Trump for a few days. Unlike you, you mention him every post, you really are quite the fanboyBut apparently Trump has been the only President ever allowed to directly appoint SCOTUS justices. They must have changed the Constitution back and forward 3 times
David and the rest of the TDS must appreciate how far seeing Trump is. No wonder those darn Dems stole the last election
It’s no wonder the Dems got the flick and Trump won in a landslide.
But keep bleating
Apologies Willo, while I was still posting on this thread, I hadn't mentioned Trump for a few days. Unlike you, you mention him every post, you really are quite the fanboy
How pathetic. What a sad sack.Yes he's essentially brigading this thread now just like he did to the US election thread resulting in it getting locked.
No need to apologise. We know you’ll more than make up for it.Apologies Willo, while I was still posting on this thread, I hadn't mentioned Trump for a few days. Unlike you, you mention him every post, you really are quite the fanboy
True he doesn't mention Trump every post. Sometimes he refers to him as GOD, Chosen One or Our Saviour.No need to apologise. We know you’ll more than make up for it.
But no, I don’t mention him every post. I’ve told you a million times not to exaggerate.
Or if you’re just knowingly telling fibs, you’ll have to change…to tigermandavesss or something similar
Now you’re just telling porkies loveydovey. Actually no, you’re telling flat out lies about me. You naughty person.True he doesn't mention Trump every post. Sometimes he refers to him as GOD, Chosen One or Our Saviour.
We need something similar in Australia. Stop the exhorbinant waste of taxpayer money.When I first saw this I honestly thought it was a joke. But it's real.....
View attachment 24914
Go get em Muskrat and Ramjam….Setting up a "Department of Government Efficiency" ?
Bwaaaa haaaargh haaaargh ... talk about a contradiction of purpose !
What a moron.
Setting up a "Department of Government Efficiency" ?
Bwaaaa haaaargh haaaargh ... talk about a contradiction of purpose !
What a moron.
I'm genuinely sorry if a little joke has you so triggered. Let me get AI to summarise your short story. I don't give a frog's for US politics. I'm not in any fictionaI gang. I am, however, intrigued when Trump apologetics get incensed over lies from the other side when we have possibly the most-incessant lying public figure ever to grace this earth. Human psychology is fascinating.Now you’re just telling porkies loveydovey. Actually no, you’re telling flat out lies about me. You naughty person.
You’ll fit in well with the other dimwits who tell blatant lies.
Pity some of you can’t actually mount any accurate or truthful arguments, or know how to debate,knowing you’ll be sitting there like a pile of macrame rugs.
Even when you know what the truth is, you’re prepared to knowingly lie rather than acknowledge I was right. It says a lot about your own morals and standards. Actually it’s funny when you keep the emu act going.
You’d rather just the usual weak little potshots. Feel free to keep them coming, it’s really amusing to see the gang pop in and take aim.
Mods should really keep some of these little kids off the adult threads.No doubt you’ll be getting some complaints from the sooks. I hope the mods just advise them to stay away when they’re outnumbered 1 to their 50