Yeah but they can't know if the ruckman is being. Grigg used to exploit this rule. They'll need honesty from the playersPenalise third man is the new rule I believe. The umps, will monitor for blocking I assume.
Yeah but they can't know if the ruckman is being. Grigg used to exploit this rule. They'll need honesty from the playersPenalise third man is the new rule I believe. The umps, will monitor for blocking I assume.
"Hit pay Dirty 100%Only a journos opinion but an interesting last sentence in the hocking paragraph

Was only stating the bleeding obvious.Only a journos opinion but an interesting last sentence in the hocking paragraph
View attachment 17736View attachment 17736
YepWas only stating the bleeding obvious.
None so blind as those that refuse to see.Yep
But some are still adamant there was nothing untoward about shockings motives
Where’s TBR…?Yep
But some are still adamant there was nothing untoward about shockings motives
True, but there are those in the media, who have strongly denied this. Maybe Anderson was on the sauce when he wrote the piece?Was only stating the bleeding obvious.
Imagine what the footy world would be saying if Gale was CEO of the ALF and in his first year Richmond won the flag…?“Deserves credit for tinkering with the rules which hit pay dirt”
It’s just says so much on so many levels - about the author and the person they are writing about.
Like who? I think TBR is the only one to strongly deny it.True, but there are those in the media, who have strongly denied this. Maybe Anderson was on the sauce when he wrote the piece?
I don’t think it was Anderson who wrote this. Scott Gullan. I think he is a handbagger supporter too, from memoryTrue, but there are those in the media, who have strongly denied this. Maybe Anderson was on the sauce when he wrote the piece?
TBR’s not media. It’s been suggested to the likes of Whateley, who has rejected it as crazy talk. I’ve heard Russell cut people off when they try and broach it in his show.Like who? I think TBR is the only one to strongly deny it.
The Geelong mafi…sorry media.I don’t think it was Anderson who wrote this. Scott Gillan. I think he is a handbagger supporter too, from memory
Mince 'Nonsense' Whateley. The other day I heard on SEN that he suggested moving the Cox Plate to November, and all I yelled out 10 times was 'nonsense!!'TBR’s not media. It’s been suggested to the likes of Whateley, who has rejected it as crazy talk. I’ve heard Russell cut people off when they try and broach it in his show.
I used to like him, but now he tries to manufacture controversy, and he’s a total apologist for the AFL. The only point he’s stayed consistent on is his issues with the score review.Mince 'Nonsense' Whateley. The other day I heard on SEN that he suggested moving the Cox Plate to November, and all I yelled out 10 times was 'nonsense!!'
Same here. Seems OK when he comes out with an idea, otherwise it's.....nonsense!!I used to like him, but now he tries to manufacture controversy, and he’s a total apologist for the AFL. The only point he’s stayed consistent on is his issues with the score review.
So what parts? That he did it deliberately to counter the RFC or that he tweaked the rules? One of those options is pure fact. Can you name any other media person who doesnt follow Geelong that have rejected it?TBR’s not media. It’s been suggested to the likes of Whateley, who has rejected it as crazy talk. I’ve heard Russell cut people off when they try and broach it in his show.
I think he’s going to wake up to a horses head in his bed for highlighting itThe Geelong mafi…sorry media.