LidsBling&Cotch said:its worth a try if he is going to try lids and cotch at hbf
Yep, and it would hardly put us any further back either - fair risk for reward I'd say - GOOD CALL!
LidsBling&Cotch said:its worth a try if he is going to try lids and cotch at hbf
Barnzy said:I didn't follow juniors back in 2003/4 but looking back over what was written about him, the hype and how he was rated (seemed a genuine chance to go #1), I would've loved to have seen play back then to see what all the fuss was about and compare him to now.
LidsBling&Cotch said:reading that article got me thinking
he likes to play as an attacking mid which i gather means he wants to do as he likes and not worry about his opponent. as we know no one gets to do that, not even ablett. now we hear the term "run with" used a lot lately which is basically means going head to head with an opposition player (refer damien hardwicks comments about deledio running with cooney after the dogs game). i might be wrong but "running with" differs to a tagging role where the players sole objective is to make sure the opposition player doesn't get a touch.
hardwick should let him go head to head in the middle with a damaging opposition player. sure his opponent would get 25 + possies but im sure bling could get the same amount. im backing bling with his 25 touches in an attacking role would include plenty of inside 50's and a few score assists as we saw last season. i'd back him to do as much damage going the other way. theres a chance his opponent will get the better of him but isn't this season all about learning and developing?
its worth a try if he is going to try lids and cotch at hbf
B1 and B2 said:Well Tygrys l'm buying my kid a Tambling badge next game in Melbourne... You can buy a Franklin one.
B2.