Dyer'ere said:Smith is a cymbal hands too. But I'd have taken him at Richmond in a heartbeat. FWIW that's all you need for a first ruck IMO.
But our cymbal hands has improved out of sight and it'll be interesting to see how they go head to head. It will be a mediocre struggle.
zippadeee said:Rather bring back graham
Around the ground Smith absolutely flogs Hampson. Younger, more agile, kicks more goals etc. Geelong dont get it wrong!nikolasmia said:Please explain how Zac Smith is better than Hampson
On occasion they do - see Hamish McIntosh, but that's probably the exception that proves the rule!saigon tiger said:Geelong dont get it wrong!
flogs is a bit muchsaigon tiger said:Around the ground Smith absolutely flogs Hampson. Younger, more agile, kicks more goals etc. Geelong dont get it wrong!
lamb22 said:Rebuke
Obstinate regression
bringing untold paths
of deep dark foreboding
depression...
Sorry I meant to post about list management decisions and my reactions to them.
Ian4 said:I think everyone agrees Ivan is shot. and even if the club recruits a ready-made ruckman, we will still need a backup. like it or not, hammer is an absolute certainty to be retained next year. you can put your house on it.
antman said:I like free verse, this is some of your better work Lamby
nikolasmia said:Please explain how Zac Smith is better than Hampson
We had to quickly re-sign him to 2 years, there was a conga line of clubs just thrusting juicy contracts Hampys way ....tigerlove said:2 years? lol, what are we worried his form will explode and we'll have to pay him substantially more the next year? Why do we always over extend the contracts of players like this?
saigon tiger said:. Geelong dont get it wrong!
lamb22 said:Rebuke
Obstinate regression
bringing untold paths
of deep dark foreboding
depression...
Sorry I meant to post about list management decisions and my reactions to them.