shaun hampson threads [merged] | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

shaun hampson threads [merged]

should We Recruit Him?

  • Yes

    Votes: 106 33.8%
  • No

    Votes: 173 55.1%
  • Cheese Sandwich / Don't Care

    Votes: 35 11.1%

  • Total voters
    314
H tiger said:
Cymbal hands really clunked a few yesterday. He isn't great but we don't have many other alternatives.

Finally some are coming around to saying the same things as I have all year. Anyway, you might see what the alternatives are next week.

Luckily for us that PA don't even have a ruck-man upstanding, and that the AFL in their wisdom decided that they were not entitled to a replacement player for Ryder (and Monfries). No, only the actual drug-cheating club were entitled to top-ups!
 
leon said:
Finally some are coming around to saying the same things as I have all year. Anyway, you might see what the alternatives are next week.

Luckily for us that PA don't even have a ruck-man upstanding, and that the AFL in their wisdom decided that they were not entitled to a replacement player for Ryder (and Monfries). No, only the actual drug-cheating club were entitled to top-ups!

Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?

Is Hamster the biggest ruck leper in the AFL, Lambchops? Is he eighth? Fifteenth? Seventh?

What's a pass? What matters? How can we measure?

He's an anti ruck dream, isn't he, Robert?
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?

Spot on. Club spin having an influence it seems.
He does a couple of decent things a game and some think he's the answer.
He's not.
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?

The bar is set pretty low when a regulation mark by any other AFL player is some sort of herculean effort by Hampy because he dropped or fumbled the past 10 before it.
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?

he he he quite funny really
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?
Pretty sure the Hamster set a fairly low bar all by himself early on.
Now that he's over achieving a bit we're allowed to be thankful and acknowledge that he's not under achieving, aren't we?

If someone gives you a tea spoon to dig a trench with instead of a back hoe, you sneak off n make yourself a cuppa n pray that you might at least find a shovel somewhere before you start digging.
 
TigerMasochist said:
Pretty sure the Hamster set a fairly low bar all by himself early on.
Now that he's over achieving a bit we're allowed to be thankful and acknowledge that he's not under achieving, aren't we?

If someone gives you a tea spoon to dig a trench with instead of a back hoe, you sneak off n make yourself a cuppa n pray that you might at least find a shovel somewhere before you start digging.

Top comment, TM, but unfortunately too much realism; wasted on the darksiders out there who only wish to search for, dwell on and celebrate the negative. They even come on to gloat when one of our guys gets injured, so they can tell us how right they were ... how it proves this guy is so soft or weak, or injury prone. What kind of follower is that? I wonder.

They are hell-bent on looking a gift horse in the mouth. Eevan has gone down with a bad back after being an incredible warrior for us (but probably soft and faking to the naysayers!). So Hammer, the back-up has had to step up, and has exceeded most supporters expectations I would say. But, no, let's just devote our energy on here to slamming him at every opportunity, obsessively, revelling in the highly witty sarcasms of the smug who are always so right, so omniscient.

Meanwhile the fantasy ruckman we so badly need is just loitering around out there somewhere at another club, twiddling his thumbs, dying to come to RFC for nothing other that a few shirts and some cuff-links. Totally unrecognised as someone who can really play the game by his current club. It's just the name and precise details that escape them.
 
lamb22 said:
Are you kidding? 6 possessions. 50% DE. no clearances, we lose clearances 30 - 28, meanwhile his opponent gets 23 possessions and 4 clearances

Plus the comedy capers of him being useless in spoiling (note Lion's first goal) and his hilarious goal attempt.

How low do we really want to set the bar for this guy?

Just hilarious. Once again, you charge in with a response to my post to someone else, which was actually only about alternative players to Hampson, given he's under an injury cloud. I didn't even mention his name. Do you have some sort of PRE alert button that sounds Code Red when myself or someone else mentions Hammer? Are you like a death adder sitting idle and harmless on your PC until it sounds, before striking into lethal attack mode, with your keyboard fangs PRE-loaded with stats?

I can hardly be bothered because it's like attempting a dialogue with some cross between a data-fixated robot and a brick wall. Firstly, I wonder if you actually attend games and watch closely, but will assume you did rather than sit back and devour a telecast, replays etc. Anyway, it's hardly any use my trying to say anything to you because your mind is closed. However, Hammer's tap-work was often superb in that game. He often demonstrates why a team is best off with a top HO ruckman. There was a goal, think it was the 3rd Q (will have to go back to the replay and locate it for you exactly if you didn't notice it because I vividly remember seeing it live) which was a thing of beauty that Jack kicked and the Lions hardly saw, let alone touched, that started from one of his HOs. But just some additional points to inflame, ... I mean, amuse you:
- Commetti describing him as 'an unsung hero' during the radio coverage (dedicated to you I think)
- Robbo also saying his tapwork is elite in today's HUN. [Please don't trouble yourself to tell me you have no respect for these media people; nor do I necessarily. It's just other views distinct from mine. Plus they might have watched as much footy as you FWIW]
- Stef Martin is an impressive player that I respect, although about 5cm shorter that Hammer, almost weighs the same, and averaged 32.5 hit outs and 21 disposals from 20 matches in 2015. So he's a seriously good player, not the conventional tap giant, more you're all-rounder. However, you seemed to miss, despite your stats mastery, his 4 clangers to H.'s 1. Subtract those, that brings him down to below his 2015 average. Hammer's 4 marks included 2 contested too; Martin none! But Stef M does this most weeks to most opponents is the point.
- But if Martin was so great, and effective, how come he did not get included in his team's best? Not on the Lions website either, nor the Age, or HUN(?) Could it be that for all his disposals, Martin didn't really influence the game that much? Many wasted, turned over?
- Also, not one coach's vote, even from Leppa! What gives?
- Will not bother disputing the clearance issue with you any more; no-one can get through to you.

Edit: noticed your alert must be malfunctioning so came back to add a couple of points.
- You might have missed it because not a data matter, but Shaun stated re his injury that it should be ok because he had just stirred up an existing one, a problem with his medial ligament. Thus, he has been playing with that for quite a while. Not easy probably against a bull like SMartin. I noticed he worked his way back into it against Hammer by his sheer aggression; he just barged into H more and more until H started to fade as the game went on. Martin is a seriously vigorous unit. Furthermore, Hampson had no Griff for a chop-out; only your man TV. But finally TV started to actually contest at the CBs after initially trying his 'dodgehim' act. Think the runner might have been sent out.
- Also, re Hammer's goal attempt, as another poster stated, thought the back-heel was pretty smart actually; would have been a ripper goal. BTW, if you'd like a quick list of 10 absolutely shocking goal misses over the week's matches, just let me know. Just some from this game: Jack's first attempt, BEllis's second, Conca's dribble=miss from directly in front on his own. See e.g. Motlop's for cats.
- Overall H won the HOs comfortably, we won the game. BE HAPPY!

It's like a red-rag to a bull, I know, but I'm just replying.
 
Burge reckons Hampson should be up and running by Tuesday. Maybe Hampson should try running more in a match instead of his casual strolling around. He just doesn't give us anything around the field so other than being an average tap ruckman he limits our game
 
Relax, we can bring in any of another 5 just bursting around the park in the twos. Just playing Hampson to annoy aficionados like you!
 
It is fun to watch Hampson try to pick up an uncontested groundball. Its like he's trying to pick up an iron filing with two north pole magnets. The dance of the fumble bee.
 
Bill James said:
It is fun to watch Hampson try to pick up an uncontested groundball. Its like he's trying to pick up an iron filing with two north pole magnets. The dance of the fumble bee.
Nearly had a coke nose spray on the keyboard.
 
Should never ever been seen wearing our jumper again. I hope he retires because they wouldn't have the balls to delist him.
Worse dud I've ever seen play the game
 
zippadeee said:
Should never ever been seen wearing our jumper again. I hope he retires because they wouldn't have the balls to delist him.
Worse dud I've ever seen play the game

So stick with Maric against the Bulldogs?
 
He is the best of a bad bunch at the moment.

We have Rance and Jack as A grade key position players.

Then we got zilch.