Tigers of Old said:Who's Petrard?
craig said:He said Big O likely ahead of Balsa Wood and Pettard maybe.
craig said:Personally i cant really see a role for Pettard now especially with the arrival of Knights and McDonough.
bullus_hit said:Depth, depth and more depth. For a rookie salary he's decent value, my only concern is fitness, I trust the medicos have done their homework.
Tigers of Old said:If he comes good the Dees will look pretty folly but they were shown right to cut A.Maric so I'm not holding my breath on Ricky P.
bullus_hit said:Big difference between the two
Tigers of Old said:You're right there Maric hasn't had severe achillies problems.
bullus_hit said:That's why I mentioned the injury problems a few posts ago, one simply has to trust our medical staff on this one.
Tigers of Old said:Agree. Definitely worth the punt IF they believe he can hold up. Have my doubts about achillies injuries.
zippadeee said:You have doubts on Pettards injuries issues, but for foley you have a tottally different view.
bullus_hit said:Big difference between the two, Pettard is a Rising Star nominee, proven matchwinner on his day and has a strong defensive side to his game, Maric has shown zilch over the course of his career, apart from one 30 possession game against a bottom 4 side.
jb03 said:Proven match winner?? The Dees have barely won a game for years. Adding Pettard as a rookie is as much of a waste of a rookie spot as Maric was always going to be. Pettard has been deplorable in the last couple of years. Picking up Melbourne discards is a complete waste of time.