Spot on, L22. I'm actually surprised to see how reasonable the discussion about Conca has been over the last few pages of the thread. It's amazing what a premiership will do. ;D
I thought Reece's game was encouraging. He's strong, ferocious and can break lines. He's the logical replacement for Broad and just like Broad he needs to be programmed to play within his limitations. As many PREnders have noted, Reece's kicking and decision making by foot is the weak point in his game when he's on the park. But I don't believe it's terminal and I certainly don't believe it can't improve. TS rightly pointed out that he's got Short covered in a canter in every other aspect of the game. And Short is no slouch, but he's not in calculations for the 22 like Conca is IMO.
Conca's poor kicking did really stand out on Saturday though and he won't last if he keeps using the ball that poorly. I did think it was uncharacteristically poor even for him. Having said that, some of his linebreaking and one particular contested pill in tight to underground handball to Dusty was top class. He had 8 intercepts which was two more than Vlastuin than Rance. Reece wins the ball back. That's not a revelation nor is it a surprise to see him leading Rance and Vlastuin in intercepts. His form was just like that before he went down early last year.
Conca's rusty performance on Saturday showed enough glimpses to suggest he will at least return to his early 2017 form which has him comfortably in our top 25 even with young players coming through. If Reece stays fit we are a better side. That's a big "if" though. But I said this last year about Reece and I will say it again, there could be significant improvement still to come should he stay on the park. He's averaged 5 games a year since he turned 22 in 2014 and has never played 20 games in a single season.
Very interested to see how he goes next week. I suspect he'll line up in round 1.