-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Reece Conca - so long and thanks for all the fish
- Thread starter Baloo
- Start date
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
On the face of it was by far the strangest selection decision of the Hardwick era
SCOOP said:
On the face of it was by far the strangest selection decision of the Hardwick era
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
Thats what i recon keeping it in house.
But just speculating of course
SCOOP said:
Thats what i recon keeping it in house.
But just speculating of course
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
Selection thursday night will dispel all myths and theories.
rosy23 said:
Selection thursday night will dispel all myths and theories.
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
I reckon that the Selection committee wanted to test Adelaide from a height perspective in their defence so bought in Elton and then had to leave a small out (one of Conca, Nahas, Edwards and King). Unfortunately the conditions were not conducive to marking. North had beaten Adelaide the week before with this sort of formula but that was inside in the comfort of Etihaad.
He should be straight back in this week with King out.
I reckon that the Selection committee wanted to test Adelaide from a height perspective in their defence so bought in Elton and then had to leave a small out (one of Conca, Nahas, Edwards and King). Unfortunately the conditions were not conducive to marking. North had beaten Adelaide the week before with this sort of formula but that was inside in the comfort of Etihaad.
He should be straight back in this week with King out.
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
If it was match ups then the club couldn't have got it more wrong and the way the game played out showed that. We got ran all over in the last two quarters, too few doing too much. Needed another three mids to roll through.
rosy23 said:
If it was match ups then the club couldn't have got it more wrong and the way the game played out showed that. We got ran all over in the last two quarters, too few doing too much. Needed another three mids to roll through.
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
Maybe but they didn't know how it was going to pan out or that it would be left for too few. Who knows whether Reece would have been in the too many or the too few category if he played anyway. He's not the equivalent of 3 more mids rolling through even if he's having a good day. I found it a strange decision too but I don't think it's right to speculate about off-field issues considering he travelled over with the team anyway. You might know more about the situation than I do though.
SCOOP said:
Maybe but they didn't know how it was going to pan out or that it would be left for too few. Who knows whether Reece would have been in the too many or the too few category if he played anyway. He's not the equivalent of 3 more mids rolling through even if he's having a good day. I found it a strange decision too but I don't think it's right to speculate about off-field issues considering he travelled over with the team anyway. You might know more about the situation than I do though.
Re: Reece "Squirrel" Conca
Indeed. He was quite good against GWS.
Perhaps. I'd sure like to ask Dimma the reason for his omission.
Col.W.Kurtz said:
Indeed. He was quite good against GWS.
jb03 said:
Perhaps. I'd sure like to ask Dimma the reason for his omission.
