It's only the u15s at this stage. If he makes it through to the u 16 squad this time next year I'll put his name up here.tigerdave said:What's your lad's name so we can keep an eye out for him?
One dominated VFL for years. One couldn't touch it at VFL so went to play against spuds in Tassie.zippadeee said:Thorpe would be a 1000 times better then batsanis
tigs2010 said:One dominated VFL for years. One couldn't touch it at VFL so went to play against spuds in Tassie.
Was one of the best players in a team that won multiple premierships. Thorp meanwhile couldn't get a kick.zippadeee said:Batsanis dominated in the VFL? News to me.. Maybe in the 2nds, but not in the seniors.
We have delisted 5 players by my count: white, tuck, McGuane, Derickx and Nahas. We have added 2 players: hampson and Petterd. Doesn't that leave 3 picks?scooty said:But we wont use 66 only using the first and 50 and 77 on petts
So assuming we don't use pick 68 (as clubs like to keep a pre season pick up their sleeve) does that mean we,re only going to use 2 picks?Giardiasis said:We have delisted 5 players by my count: white, tuck, McGuane, Derickx and Nahas. We have added 2 players: hampson and Petterd. Doesn't that leave 3 picks?
Yes we will. Quayle's article is wrong. If that were the case we'd use 66 to upgrade Pettifer.scooty said:But we wont use 66 only using the first and 50 and 77 on petts
tigs2010 said:Yes we will. Quayle's article is wrong. If that were the case we'd use 66 to upgrade Pettifer.
1. He earnt it.turk-d-tiger said:Not sure if possible so would be good if someone who knows chips in
OUT: White,McGone,Derickx,Tuck,Nahas
IN : Hampson
4 open positions
Why would we upgrade Petterd to the senior list in the ND when
1. We can have him still on the Rookie list for another year
2. Just upgrade him in the PSD if a better player not available
Harry said:locked and loaded. we don't need late picks