rosy23 said:I'm sure we would have wanted to keep Otto if his heart was in it at Tigerland. It wasn't and he didn't want to be there so no point hanging on to him. Disappointing, not only cos I have his signed jumper, but because he was such an important player to lose.
We offered him one year and port offered 3. I think that shows we didn't really want him, rightly or wrongly.Tiger Pops said:White perhaps?
Tigermad2005 said:When was the last time we lost a player we really wanted to keep?
Sintiger said:But yes he was offered a contract and walked
Tenacious said:Wasn't wanted anyway.
pessimistic_ said:So we just pretend we do not want Lennon?
Tigermad2005 said:So no one in the last 10 years then.
A few clubs can not say that.
Semantics - RFC neither sufficiently valued nor needed him and rightly so. History now anyway.rosy23 said:That is clearly not true considering he was offered a contract. Wasn't wanted enough to offer a contract similar to Port's but he was still considered a required player on our terms.