Pretty sure they aren't the only ones.Soldo and Graham.
I'm surprised they signed Short to 5 yrs
He wouldve been a perfect option to trade out. Especially now Rioli has blitzed the half back role
Pretty sure they aren't the only ones.Soldo and Graham.
Talk to us big fella? We're amongst friends. I'll take stab - Broad/Ross/Short/Mc intosh/PickettBreaking news little Zipmanics
He isn't the only big name we have asked to explore there options .
we were never going to go into 2 seasons without bringing in kids
And No the Big name isn't Collier Dawkins or Dow
I’ll narrow it downBreaking news little Zipmanics
He isn't the only big name we have asked to explore there options .
we were never going to go into 2 seasons without bringing in kids
And No the Big name isn't Collier Dawkins or Dow
I honestly thought they would name him captain after Cotch stepped downI'd rather make him captain than trade him.
True, but Kelly wasn’t “fabric”You do have to give a bit to get a bit.
The difficulty is that the Richmond boys are so tight with each other and each important to the fabric of the club in their own way.
Shorty a case in point. Hugely popular, energetic and culture driver. But expendable out on the ground.
Graham similar. So on and so on.
Geelong survived and actually thrived when they lost Kelly.
Cut throat business.
He was runners up in the B&F last year, I think this is a hasty & reactive move. Unless we get extra currency I cannot see any point trading him, Hopper is a similar type, albeit with a few extra runs on the board.I like Fridge but he is never going to be a superstar and to be honest has been average the last couple of years. Ross may even have moved ahead of him or at least along side.
If we had the opportunity to trade him for a pick around 20 and used his salary to bring in Bowes and pick 7 from the Suns I would do it. Pick 7, 20ish and Bowes for Graham .....where do I sign?
Dont disagree re the need for role players but i see Ross taking the step up in the next few years and i see him as an upgrade to Graham. Short has just been terrible for almost 2 years now. Most of his metres gained have no real hurt factor and he is now becoming a complete liability without the ball and a lot of times even with it.I think ‘the game‘ has passed a few of us by (I put myself in that bucket)
Evaluating players like Graham (and Short for that matter) based purely on their individual traits in isolation doesn‘t take into account their importance to ‘the way we play’. Not that I think stats provide all the answers in and of themselves, although key indicators still provide a great snapshot if we’re on track or not. Eg, Graham’s pressure acts, Short’s metres gained (Short’s pinpoint passing to the exact position of threat just after Graham forced the turn over at the right time in the correct location).
A coachable player that does what he’s instructed to do and plays his role to a high degree of consistency (as opposed to being consistent from an individual perceived form perspective) is the type of player required.
I value him. I also value Short when the whole team are playing their roles well.
Personal view but Hopper is next level to Graham as a player.He was runners up in the B&F last year, I think this is a hasty & reactive move. Unless we get extra currency I cannot see any point trading him, Hopper is a similar type, albeit with a few extra runs on the board.
So Gold Coast are offering pick 7? That is one helluva salary cap dump. What's the catch here?I heard that it will take a big offer to tempt him.
Likely he stays at Richmond, unless we are going to try and do the Bowes + pick 7 for cap space trade that Gold Coast are reportedly offering around.