evo said:Touk Miller for me. Good leader, nice build. Lots of upside.
What are your thoughts on Clem Smith?bullus_hit said:Pretty sure he'll be a Hawk.
Smoking Aces said:What are your thoughts on Clem Smith?
Reading some phantom drafts it's hard to gauge where he will end up going. Seems to have gone out of favour throughout the course of the year. To me it smells like another WCE / Freo tanking tactic.
Cheers BH.bullus_hit said:He was suffering from a back injury at the combine, maybe he even staged a little. I also noted Pickett ran some slower times so maybe there's a bit of foxing going on. I think he'll be picked up in the top 40, definitely a boom/bust type. I would imagine he recorded some ordinary skinfold tests so there's work to be done. I much preferred his form last year and I thought he did ok in the VFL game. At 52 I'd say yes, at 33 maybe not.
Smoking Aces said:Cheers BH.
I will be crossing fingers / toes that we somehow land one of Neal-Bullen / Blakely / Gore / Miller with our second pick.
Add either Wright / Weller / Duggan / Cockatoo to that mix and we would have nailed this draft.
Geez McGrath looked good against the Pies.bullus_hit said:Yes, the stage is definitely set to get 2 very good players. I even think there's some significant value at the deep end. Another smokey could be Jaden McGrath, thought he looked very much at home against the bigger bodies. At 52 or 70 he could be a real steal.
tigerlove said:Touk Miller in the Herald Sun talked about potentially being taken between 30-34. Being described as a pure inside midfielder tackling machine. Seems to be a bit of love for him here.
tigs2010 said:Geez McGrath looked good against the Pies.
bullus_hit said:If the Hawks take someone like Vickers-Willis then Miller may slide, would be a good selection at 33.
just had a look at his vid, looks the goods. would you prefer himk or Lonie? i don't know much about either but have heard a bit more about Lonie being wanted & not much on McGrath.bullus_hit said:He certainly did, Brayshaw was BOG but I had McGrath second best for the AIS. It's only one game game but he looked really good, much better than Duggan & Petracca on the day.
Jonesracing82 said:just had a look at his vid, looks the goods. would you prefer himk or Lonie? i don't know much about either but have heard a bit more about Lonie being wanted & not much on McGrath.
Stylo said:Depending how we go with pick 12, and whether Neal-Bullen/Miller are one the table, one of the other hyphenated boys in DVR or Vickers-Willis would be good gets. DVR is silky, tough and provides a lot of run. Could easily see him playing on a wing in future. Vickers-Willis I see long term as an inside ball winner with a lot of positional versatility (190cm - bit of Mundy about him). DVR I'd want if we got Ellis or Duggan to bring a bit of spark. Vickers-Willis if we got Weller or the *smile*.
bullus_hit said:I personally don't see the point in recruiting DVR & Duggan, they will effectively be competing for the same position in the first couple of years. Both would also be competing with Batch who recently inked a new contract. Vickers-Willis is an interesting proposition but I still would prefer the inside mid, to me they are bankable commodities and we cannot afford a misstep at 33.