"Don't know what you've got til it's gone"You don't know what you've got til it's gone.
Don't it always seem to be so
You train someone up, then they go
"Don't know what you've got til it's gone"You don't know what you've got til it's gone.
Sin and Posh are correct, reckon you are getting body language confused with effort. You only need to remember our much loved number 12 with all his wonderful foibles. The Ricoh man could never be accused of lacking effort. The stats also suggest that Shai was indeed giving everything he had within the confines of the role he was expected to play.So it’s okay for players to not give 100% if they don’t get to play in their position of choice. That’s a losers mentality.
Professional footballers get paid extremely well and giving 100% is a non negotiable as far as I’m concerned.
Actually I take that back, it doesn’t matter what level of football you play there’s no room for blokes who aren’t prepared to give everything you’ve got
I see it more like Sin. I never saw anything of Shai when at the games mainly, that he wasn't putting in 100%. This seems to be a generally held view for some reason but personally I didn't see that from him. It was just for large parts of the game this year the ball wasn't in his vicinity.
He can still put in 100% but become
Perhaps he could have got inthe vicinity given the way the modern roving maul works!disillusioned with the way he is being asked to play.
Nah. Dusty, Judd, Crappa, Pendles, Buddy, n a whole heap of other star players all come through the draft every year. Just gotta pick em when they're there.What I do know is that our chances of getting another Shai in the draft are slim.
Not blaming him for our situation.
I'm saying his performance output doesn't match his potential. He's not a passive rag doll who can't influence things.
You're also assuming he hasn't bought into the changes.
Stop behaving like a drama queen and read what is actually written
I agree he is our most talented, gifted footballer. I've said he could easily get to be mentioned as one of the elite talents in the league.Imo he is our best player and at 25, has his best football years still to come.
You accuse him of not trying hard enough. You don't recognise that he has largely been played out of position this year and has not been allowed to play so that he may reach his potential.
And apparently he now wants out, which you seem to think reflects on his lack of character.
I disagree.
Round | Opponent | Disposals | CBAs | Total Centre Clearances in Match | Clearances | No of disposals outside F50 | Inside 50 | Goals | GA | SI |
0 | GCS | 8 | 11 | 26 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
1 | Carlton | 18 | 15 | 23 | 2 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
2 | Port Adelaide | 22 | 20 | 31 | 5 | 18 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
3 | Sydney | 25 | 14 | 20 | 3 | 21 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
4 | St Kilda | 19 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 14 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 8 |
5 | West Coast | 21 | 17 | 23 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
6 | BYE | |||||||||
7 | Melbourne | 18 | 13 | 18 | 2 | 15 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
8 | Fremantle | 13 | 20 | 22 | 3 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
9 | Bulldogs | 19 | 14 | 24 | 4 | 14 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
10 | Brisbane | 18 | 29 | 32 | 7 | 15 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
11 | Essendon (Subbed) | 16 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 10 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
12 | Geelong (DNP) | |||||||||
13 | Adelaide | 20 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
14 | Hawthorn | 15 | 14 | 21 | 1 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
15 | BYE | |||||||||
16 | Carlton | 17 | 21 | 30 | 4 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
17 | Fremantle | 16 | 7 | 24 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
18 | GWS | 18 | 14 | 28 | 4 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
19 | Port Adelaide | 17 | 23 | 29 | 3 | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
20 | Collingwood | 21 | 18 | 23 | 4 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
21 | North Melbourne | 12 | 12 | 21 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
22 | St Kilda | 11 | 12 | 23 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
23 | Hawthorn | 12 | 13 | 25 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 7 |
24 | GCS | 13 | 9 | 25 | 0 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
Thanks for doing that work General. It must have taken some time to put all that together.So, let's get to some data.
Now, by no means would anyone dispute Shai was a forward mid, not mid forward.
However, he had the second highest centre bounce attendances for Richmond, behind Nankervis (328) - nearly 15 a game. Nankervis had 494, at 23 a game. He'd be at a very large proportion of our centre bounces, maybe 85-90%.
So comparatively, Shai was up in the middle a reasonable amount for someone who was lapparently eft down in the forward line helplessly to battle against the hordes.
Our coaches apparently let him down. So I've gone and taken a look at his numbers. This is purely a manual task, but the AFL app has some gold if you'd like to go verify it, one round at a time. From it, you can find out where players are getting the ball, and all sorts of other useful information. I've done some arbitrary analysis to dig into this belief that he wasn't up in the midfield at all.
The method I used was to find out several bits of info.
Firstly, how many times did Shai get the ball. Of those, how many of those possessions were outside F50. Now, I know some of the time he'd have led up to the ball from the forwardline, but marked outside. So whenever the disposal was marked as just outside forward 50, I didn't count this as outside, giving a bias to those possessions as inside even though the data says they weren't. This will tell you roughly how many times he's disposed of the ball moving outside the forwardline (even if he started off in the pocket or flank). Again, the data will show whether he was left to rot, or was a part of the action.
I've also recorded how many times Shai attended centre bounces in each game. Next to this you can see how many times in a game there was a centre clearance. This gives an approximate, but slightly inaccurate amount of times the ball was actually bounced. From this you can see how many times we've had Bolton in for the Centre bounces per game and what ratio of these (again, approximate) we used him in the match. As you can see, in most cases it was over 50% of our Centre bounces he was there. Sometimes a lot more, other times not as much. Whilst these are not the bible, and I'm not claiming them to be, they paint a trend in actually how he's used, not in how our eyes see him as being used.
For overall effectiveness/damage in his game, I've included how many times he's been a part of a score involvement, how many times he's directly assisted a goal and of course how many times he's kicked it through the middle.
Round Opponent Disposals CBAs Total Centre Clearances
in MatchClearances No of disposals
outside F50Inside 50 Goals GA SI 0 GCS 8 11 26 3 5 1 3 0 3 1 Carlton 18 15 23 2 14 4 0 1 4 2 Port Adelaide 22 20 31 5 18 7 2 1 8 3 Sydney 25 14 20 3 21 8 2 0 10 4 St Kilda 19 7 16 2 14 3 4 1 8 5 West Coast 21 17 23 5 14 2 3 1 8 6 BYE 7 Melbourne 18 13 18 2 15 7 1 1 3 8 Fremantle 13 20 22 3 10 5 0 0 1 9 Bulldogs 19 14 24 4 14 1 2 0 5 10 Brisbane 18 29 32 7 15 4 0 0 3 11 Essendon (Subbed) 16 12 21 3 10 4 2 2 5 12 Geelong (DNP) 13 Adelaide 20 13 20 7 11 6 0 2 7 14 Hawthorn 15 14 21 1 12 4 1 0 4 15 BYE 16 Carlton 17 21 30 4 13 2 0 0 6 17 Fremantle 16 7 24 2 4 4 4 0 7 18 GWS 18 14 28 4 13 4 2 1 5 19 Port Adelaide 17 23 29 3 15 3 1 1 7 20 Collingwood 21 18 23 4 14 4 0 0 6 21 North Melbourne 12 12 21 3 7 3 1 1 7 22 St Kilda 11 12 23 0 6 3 2 0 4 23 Hawthorn 12 13 25 1 4 3 3 0 7 24 GCS 13 9 25 0 6 2 1 0 3
Lol, you're the only person i know who'd make a statement have data prove them wrong, then try twist it into their point of view. Delusional.Good job General.
Your work confirms what I have long suspected. He is a better player than many of us have understood and that he is needed at Punt road come hell or high
water.
Character.. lack of effort, is not an issue. Keep him.
He is needed. You are deluded if you think otherwise, as you do.Lol, you're the only person i know who'd make a statement have data prove them wrong, then try twist it into their point of view. Delusional.
You're not only deluded mate, you've either got a selective attention span, or your hard of reading. I'll try be brief, but I think based on evidence, this'll fall on "deaf ears."He is needed. You are deluded if you think otherwise, as you do.
I see it more like Sin. I never saw anything of Shai when at the games mainly, that he wasn't putting in 100%. This seems to be a generally held view for some reason but personally I didn't see that from him. It was just for large parts of the game this year the ball wasn't in his vicinity.
He can still put in 100% but become disillusioned with the way he is being asked to play.
To all but the twit who wrote this post Shai is 25 with 6-7 years left. Shai is our best player and with the players we will have coming in over the next two years there is no reason he can’t play in further final series.You're not only deluded mate, you've either got a selective attention span, or your hard of reading. I'll try be brief, but I think based on evidence, this'll fall on "deaf ears."
The guy wants out. I believe he should be in the upper echelon of performance amongst all players in the league, not just at the level amongst the good small forwards going around. He has that potential. He's not living up to it. If he wants to go, and were getting 2 picks in the top 10 or thereabouts, I'm OK to let him go.
He's not going to be on the list when we next play finals, so if he wants to go, and the value is there, lets cash in our chips. It will be hard to find someone with as much potential, but if the draft is as good as it's supposed to be, back our team to get someone who can meet the same standard of performance more consistently.
Now, I'm not gonna say anymore to you, so if that doesn't sink in and you can't accept it without twisting words, have fun arguing in an echo chamber.
Without letting Shai n Sausage go we're not gunna get much of a new n better midfield with just the number 1 pick n maybe a few second rounders. All the cream of the potential midfielders will be gone in the first dozen or so picks n then you're just hoping to score a bonearse out of the later picks.To all but the twit who wrote this post Shai is 25 with 6-7 years left. Shai is our best player and with the players we will have coming in over the next two years there is no reason he can’t play in further final series.
We will soon have a better midfield and a better team with finals prospects.
No need to let Shai go and every reason to keep him.
I don't watch an enormous amount of non Richmond games but I have been watching most of the finals. Quite a few times I have noticed that there are few times during games that players don't gut chase and appear not to be putting in 100%. It made me think that if they were Richmond players there would be labelled as not trying.I see it more like Sin. I never saw anything of Shai when at the games mainly, that he wasn't putting in 100%. This seems to be a generally held view for some reason but personally I didn't see that from him. It was just for large parts of the game this year the ball wasn't in his vicinity.
He can still put in 100% but become disillusioned with the way he is being asked to play.
"Fremantle will offer two first-rounders for Shai Bolton, but not picks 9 and 10 given it is still holding out hope it might secure fellow Tiger Liam Baker. The Dockers have picks 9, 10 and 16, with the last pick likely to drift out three spots given NGA and father-son bids."Anyone got the herald sun article about the bolton trade offer