NRL | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

NRL

mb64 said:
The Deloittes review must be made public.

they are saying they cannot release it due to confidentiality agreements some of the parties signed in agreeing to support the investigation

wonder if these are the same agreements the players asked for, were rejected on by News, and therefore caused all players to refuse to co-operate

this whole thing stinks
 
Tiger74 said:
they are saying they cannot release it due to confidentiality agreements some of the parties signed in agreeing to support the investigation

wonder if these are the same agreements the players asked for, were rejected on by News, and therefore caused all players to refuse to co-operate

this whole thing stinks
Spot on tigger 74
 
according to todays press, looking more and more likely GI will be going

deal is coming down to the Storm paying $80k of GI's wage next year, but this being included in our cap for this year
 
just mentioned on the Footy Show, apparently News Limited in their war with Fairfax were about to report the full salaries of ALL Storm players in their papers.

Storm got wind, and Bellamy basically said they would not play and he would accept being sacked if they did this

News have backed down, but hey, not further evidence of News putting their own interests ahead of the clubs  :mad:


also GI deal is apparently all but done, is supposed to sign with Brisbane today :(
 
Good win to the Storm last night over Penrith,Matt Elliott still yet to aoch a sinning side against Bellamy.With all the cap dramas l haven't watched much NRL this year but Dragons look the side to beat assuming they don't choke again.
 
GI is still in play, with GC upping the ante

that being said, it seems the Titans are having a few issues paying the bills (even though they have a million to chuck at GI):

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/qrl-calls-for-titans-financial-inquiry/story-e6frexnr-1225884718268
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/nrls-16m-bailout-for-titans-sharks-and-knights-to-pay-wages/story-e6frexnr-1225896464994

on a more humorous note, seems the folks at Storm need to get their stories right.

on one hand they admit to deleting anti-News Limited because they don't want to advocate criticising their employer. On the otherhand, News say only posts with bad language were deleted

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/news-gags-its-storm-website-critics-20100726-10soh.html
 
Tiger74 said:
GI is still in play, with GC upping the ante

that being said, it seems the Titans are having a few issues paying the bills (even though they have a million to chuck at GI):

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/qrl-calls-for-titans-financial-inquiry/story-e6frexnr-1225884718268
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/nrls-16m-bailout-for-titans-sharks-and-knights-to-pay-wages/story-e6frexnr-1225896464994

on a more humorous note, seems the folks at Storm need to get their stories right.

on one hand they admit to deleting anti-News Limited because they don't want to advocate criticising their employer. On the otherhand, News say only posts with bad language were deleted

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/news-gags-its-storm-website-critics-20100726-10soh.html

Senator Conroy should be happy with this.
 
Tiger74 said:
GI is still in play, with GC upping the ante

that being said, it seems the Titans are having a few issues paying the bills (even though they have a million to chuck at GI):

http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/qrl-calls-for-titans-financial-inquiry/story-e6frexnr-1225884718268
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/nrl/nrls-16m-bailout-for-titans-sharks-and-knights-to-pay-wages/story-e6frexnr-1225896464994

on a more humorous note, seems the folks at Storm need to get their stories right.

on one hand they admit to deleting anti-News Limited because they don't want to advocate criticising their employer. On the otherhand, News say only posts with bad language were deleted

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/league-news/news-gags-its-storm-website-critics-20100726-10soh.html
All anti news posts would have been removed.there would have been plenty of them.
 
Looks likely Inglis will stay at the Storm

NRL Premiership
Greg Inglis

Clubs swarming ... Greg Inglis is set to stay with the Storm. Sam Ruttyn
Greg Inglis expected to announce he will stay with Melbourne Storm

By Matt Marshall and Peter Badel
August 08, 2010

In a stunning twist, Melbourne Storm are set to announce on Monday they have won the battle to retain superstar centre Greg Inglis.

The protracted contract saga over the hottest signature in rugby league took a dramatic turn, with Inglis now tipped to see out the final two years of his $660,000-per-season contract at the Storm, shunning approaches from the Brisbane Broncos and Gold Coast Titans.

The Queenslanders aren't dead in the water yet, but with an official decision expected to be revealed tomorrow in Melbourne, the Storm appears increasingly likely to emerge from their crippling salary cap scandal with their "Fab Four" of Inglis, Cameron Smith, Billy Slater and Cooper Cronk intact.

Inglis' likely retention for 2011-12 is set to come at a cost, with Kiwi Test forwards Adam Blair and Sika Manu, and perhaps centre Dane Nielsen, looming as likely targets for fresh poaching bids from rival NRL clubs.

Should Inglis stay in Melbourne it would be a bitter blow both for the Broncos, touted as frontrunners to poach the Kangaroos and Maroons Origin star from next year, and also the cashed-up Titans.

"There's no edict at all that we can't keep all four, the only edict we have is to be under the salary cap next year. How we do that is our choice," a high-ranking Storm official said.

"And, God yeah, we want to keep Greg. He's a once-in-a-generation player. He brings so many elements on and off the field.

"We've got to look at the big picture too and take his personal interests into account also. Were going through all that at the moment.

"But it's not a matter of Greg being desperate to get out of the place . . . that couldn't be further from the truth. It's very complicated, it's not as simple as him wanting to stay or wanting to go, but we need to get on with it so we resume everything else."

Brisbane have played hard-ball in their dealings to poach Inglis - publicly declaring they would not waver from their offer, believed to be worth $400,000 per season plus a car.

The Broncos were extremely confident of luring Inglis to Red Hill after he expressed his desire to make a fresh start with fiancee Sally Robinson, who lives and works in Brisbane.

But Inglis family friend Adrian Coolwell, whom the centre regards as his second dad after being billeted with him in Queensland as a 16-year-old, said he was now certain the Maroons flyer would stay in Melbourne.

"Sally will keep travelling down," he said. "She was doing that anyway so its not the big deal some people might think.

"She's got some business contacts in Melbourne which she often visits so there's not a problem with the travel.

"Another factor is Greg's parents. They have just settled in Melbourne and they actually like it there so it all points to Greg staying. My gut feel is he will stay.

"Greg was wanting to stay there all along, if the salary cap stuff never happened Greg would never have thought about leaving."

The Broncos were offered verbal assurances Inglis wanted to link with the six-time premiers, but the negotiations hinged on the Storm's blessing and were subject to NRL directives on Melbourne's salary cap position, which were finalised late last week.

It is believed Brisbane's final contract offer would have left the Storm to pick up $410,000 of his bill over the next two years, under their salary cap, a position Inglis and Melbourne club were unhappy about.

The Titans offer was more viable - valued at $550,000 next year, increasing to the full $660,000 in 2012 - meaning the Storm would pay only $110,000 under next year's cap and nothing in 2012.

link http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,27522389-5018866,00.html


It will still see some casualties. Some good players will have to be let go regardless.
 
love to see this happen, Inglis/Cronk/Slater/Smith all staying at the Storm will *smile* of Gallop to no end :cutelaugh
 
Tiger74 said:
love to see this happen, Inglis/Cronk/Slater/Smith all staying at the Storm will p!ss of Gallop to no end :cutelaugh
l'd prefer to see Inglis go & then our overall squad would be much better.Your right about Gallop,he wouldn't like the 4 to remain at Storm.
 
mb64 said:
l'd prefer to see Inglis go & then our overall squad would be much better.Your right about Gallop,he wouldn't like the 4 to remain at Storm.

I used to agree with you, but changed my mind

inglis is a once in a generation freak, and he is still bloody young - we can rebuild around him
 
Tiger74 said:
I used to agree with you, but changed my mind

inglis is a once in a generation freak, and he is still bloody young - we can rebuild around him

Too expensive to build around him now we have stay under the cap.
 
jb03 said:
Too expensive to build around him now we have stay under the cap.

year by year the current contracts can be renegotiated down, and thats cool because we will have kids initially anyway

one thing the storm have a good record on is developing kids, and i'm willing to invest in that again

I personally think GI is likely to be to league what Matthews is remembered by us as being for AFL, and you don't let that kind of talent go lightly
 
Tiger74 said:
year by year the current contracts can be renegotiated down, and thats cool because we will have kids initially anyway

one thing the storm have a good record on is developing kids, and i'm willing to invest in that again

I personally think GI is likely to be to league what Matthews is remembered by us as being for AFL, and you don't let that kind of talent go lightly

Disagree.
 
Tiger74 said:
year by year the current contracts can be renegotiated down, and thats cool because we will have kids initially anyway

one thing the storm have a good record on is developing kids, and i'm willing to invest in that again

I personally think GI is likely to be to league what Matthews is remembered by us as being for AFL, and you don't let that kind of talent go lightly
Problem with Inglis is he generally starts the season overweight & lacking some fitness.Doesn't do much in early games & before you know it rep season is here.His best is better than anyone but it doesn't happen often enough.He's in 2 minds about where he wants to play due to his fiance living in Brisbane.Slater,Cronk & Smith more important.
 
all academic now - Inglis and White are gone, which puts the Storm under the cap for 2011

well its all done now, and a few more useless games and we can get back to winning premierships once more