Are you alright mate? You seem steamed up about all sorts of aspects of this case and you are attributing comments and arguments and positions re. this particular case to me that I haven't posted.
I never said anything about Johns' job for example.
What's with all the bizarro smileys? Are they for real? Are you able to put forth a view without rushing all over the place?
And do discussions of morals etc upset you? Is the law the only thing that counts?
Lots of questions, I know, but you seem very irrational over quite a number of threads.
I never said anything about Johns' job for example.
What's with all the bizarro smileys? Are they for real? Are you able to put forth a view without rushing all over the place?
And do discussions of morals etc upset you? Is the law the only thing that counts?
Lots of questions, I know, but you seem very irrational over quite a number of threads.