Whingers. Geez there's some miserable sods out there who complain a lot.
You go to have a whinge and some bastard says you need to provide feedback via the app . . . oh, and you have to rate the app first (rating: don't give a sh&^t).
DS
Whingers. Geez there's some miserable sods out there who complain a lot.
I’m not that ancient either. Cusp of millennial and Gen-X. So have the benefit of seeing lower tech and higher tech functionality and hence have a healthy level of skepticism when assessing new introductions as to the relative benefits.I'm with you on this, making you get an app is just silly. Maybe next time someone tells me that I'll claim I don't have a smart phone (aren't dumb phones a new trend? Hope so, will get around this).
But what really gets me with this sort of thing is that they are massively over-complicating something which should be so simple. I know they are doing it to get the kickbacks from marketing and data, but what they are doing is so much more complicated than it needs to be. You buy a gym membership, they provide access to the gym - nice and simple, nice and easy. Now they make it more difficult for you to access what you paid for. I have never understood why people and organisations want to over-complicate things. Until recently I worked at a university, I spent years resisting putting basic info for students (like who to contact, specific rules for courses/disciplines and the like) into the Learning Management System - the info is not private, not sensitive, not of interest to anyone but the students - why not make it easier for the students to access on a public website rather than making them sign in to get basic info?
DS
Had to sign up to two layers of online accounts (with the option of attached apps) to sign my son up for 7YOs introductory cricket. Two more online accounts I won’t maintain and won’t remember the passwords I created anyway.You go to have a whinge and some bastard says you need to provide feedback via the app . . . oh, and you have to rate the app first (rating: don't give a sh&^t).
DS
Paralleling with that, "done" instead of "did". Eg He "done" a good job.How about using his instead of he's.
People lament the standard of schooling these days, well there are plenty of people schooled a long time ago who have a lot of trouble with their English expression.
DS
Absolute *smile*.Just to bring up driving again, the idiots were out in full force on the weekend. Endless numbers of drivers sitting in the right hand lane on the freeways driving under the speed limit.
Told you before Drof. It's correct but no-one likes it. Everybody still pronounces the suburb as 'Lay-law' but officially it's pronounced 'Law-ler'. Non-stop debate for 40+ years between all neighbours....Paralleling with that, "done" instead of "did". Eg He "done" a good job.
Listening to the absolutely dud commentators calling the VIC Metro game on Sunday, I am convinced we butcher the English language as much as the Americans, if not more. In that game Smillie was "Smiley" and Lalor was "Lawler".
Listen to the first 2 seconds of this.Told you before Drof. It's correct but no-one likes it. Everybody still pronounces the suburb as 'Lay-law' but officially it's pronounced 'Law-ler'. Non-stop debate for 40+ years between all neighbours....
That's not "a little thing that annoys" me, it does my head in. As does, when I get stuck behind someone who is doing 10+kph under the speed limit and then the runt runs a yellow/red light.Just to bring up driving again, the idiots were out in full force on the weekend. Endless numbers of drivers sitting in the right hand lane on the freeways driving under the speed limit.
Yeah I know. The suburb's named after him but the big debate between all neighbours and council in fact has been strong for a long time. I agree with you as "lay-lor" sounds more logical going by the spelling. I really despise hearing "law-ler".Listen to the first 2 seconds of this.
Those suggesting "Lawler" in the debate would be wrong then and that in fact, there is no debate.Yeah I know. The suburb's named after him but the big debate between all neighbours and council in fact has been strong for a long time. I agree with you as "lay-lor" sounds more logical going by the spelling. I really despise hearing "law-ler".
Poor Sam's going to be hounded with this question once he debuts and is interviewed, and I'd say the debate will run through the football media and commentators.Those suggesting "Lawler" in the debate would be wrong then and that in fact, there is no debate.
Well, I have to admit, even the Irish (where the name originates from) call it a mixture of "Lay-lor" and "Lawler".Poor Sam's going to be hounded with this question once he debuts and is interviewed, and I'd say the debate will run through the football media and commentators.
Bringing up tech again David.I'm with you on this, making you get an app is just silly. Maybe next time someone tells me that I'll claim I don't have a smart phone (aren't dumb phones a new trend? Hope so, will get around this).
But what really gets me with this sort of thing is that they are massively over-complicating something which should be so simple. I know they are doing it to get the kickbacks from marketing and data, but what they are doing is so much more complicated than it needs to be. You buy a gym membership, they provide access to the gym - nice and simple, nice and easy. Now they make it more difficult for you to access what you paid for. I have never understood why people and organisations want to over-complicate things. Until recently I worked at a university, I spent years resisting putting basic info for students (like who to contact, specific rules for courses/disciplines and the like) into the Learning Management System - the info is not private, not sensitive, not of interest to anyone but the students - why not make it easier for the students to access on a public website rather than making them sign in to get basic info?
DS
Bringing up tech again David.
Got a directive from work, that they need to upgrade our current IPhone. Don’t see the need, would prefer not. The 3 year old one is perfectly fine. Seems absurdly wasteful.
Anyway. The IT people came around to transfer me over to the new phone. I think a Luddite like myself baffles them.
“Shall we transfer your banking apps and cards over?” “Haven’t got any of that.” Confused look….”None??….really??”
“Shall we transfer over your Google Authenticator credentials?” “Don’t think I’ve ever used it.” Baffled look…..”For MFA?” “What’s MFA?” “Multi Factor Authentication.” IT officer picks up phone checks out Google Authenticator, baffled look on face when realises the app has never been touched or set up.
“Shall we sync it to your smart wat….?” Cut her self off realising by now the pointlessness of the question, seeing me raising my wrist to reveal a $40 Casio F-91W.