Comments not so much directed at you but, honestly, I have had this discussion with about 20 others posters on PRE, it's like Groundhog Day. Not interested in re-hashing it any more. You must have missed it all; like on Hammer's thread.
I never have claimed that, or made out that H is any sort of champion whatsoever, so cut the 'derogatory' hyperbole yourself. Same with your next two sentences exactly.
The view I responded to of yours was total supposition because H did not play against Gawn, so cannot be on 'hist. evidence.' My only claim is that he was our best option in 2016 and performed far better than most of his knockers care to admit, like you. You virtually concede this but try to walk around it with further irrelevant, retrospective claims about Maric pre-2016.
I cited the Jacobs match-up as merely one example which disproves your claims in the post referred to. Did you notice the 'et al'? Not going to troll through match stats this year for other examples because I have done it several times before, plus these records may be taken down AFL site now, not sure. Look at the Hampson thread.
As for 'There is no way Hampson is an AFL quality ruckman in the mould that is required in today's game,' given he just played 20 AFL games for the 2016 season, you are again factually wrong.
There is a wide distinction between facts and opinions. So either we see how H would really perform against Gawn in '17, or Nankervis, a ruck much in the Maric mould. Will be interesting to see how they each go if it happens.