-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Hands up if you think JR is a skinny flanker with an attitude disorder?
- Thread starter tigergollywog
- Start date
better get the compression bandages on his head fast because after this there's a good chance that big head of his just might explode!
;D
hey i don't care if he kicks goals for himself rather than the jumper, different players are motivated by different things, whatever it takes to get it done...
:clap
;D
hey i don't care if he kicks goals for himself rather than the jumper, different players are motivated by different things, whatever it takes to get it done...
:clap
maybe it's time we started giving francis jackson some credit. i was at that 2006 pre-draft info session and i remember that FJ was jizzing at the prospect of getting JR to the RFC. while maybe we were a little lucky he fell throrugh to pick 13, but i do think it's time we gave FJ due credit.
tigertim said:
I think most critics did. I seem to recall most saying that he needed to kick straight. Getting the ball wasn't the issue.
Havnt heard from Crumpet Avenger for a while? C'mon Crumpy, give us the Fonzy style "I was WWWWWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRONG"
Do i have to keep repeating myself,so nuff nuffs like yourself get it through your heads?Barnzy said:Like his game today Madcow? 10 goals for a flanker is not a bad effort.
From the teams perspective,Jack would be better playing off the HFF.His rightfull position.
CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:
? Why can't you just accept you are wrong?
So you still think he is a third tall? Wouldn't that mean we would use him less? Or are the other 2 talls decoys? Please explain as I'm another nuffy who can't understand your logic.
CptJonno2Madcow2005 said:
I still can't understand your logic either. You've been calling him a flanker/3rd tall too then you changed your story to "he would be better used on a flank" as people questioned it. I quite clearly remember you saying he wasn't a KPF, your excuse was something about not beating his opponnents enough or taking contested marks when I asked why he wasn't a KPF. You were wrong, plain and simple. It's okay, you can admit it. We're all wrong at some point or another.
He's a contested marking FF, why take him away from his natural position and strengths? For him to be pushed out to the flank wouldn't Griffiths/Astbury have to be better than him and overtake his current role? I don't see that happening. Astbury is also playing and developing in the backline.
