It is obviously (The meeting) true otherwise there would be denials.There have been numerous opportunities for the club & or players to deny the story & it hasn't happened.IanG said:If the story isn't true I really wonder why they don't just deny it.
Tiger74 said:Sad story about the Gilmour kid
Richo would have been better saying nothing,in fact he probably would have been better not coming on tonight.Leysy Days said:Its obvious Richo's been told by the club not to go into ANYTHING in regards to the last week or so's controversies MB.
To nail Hutchy, all he had to so was state what "happened" then if Hutchy disagreed say "Craig are you calling me a liar YES or NO".
Not sure what Snatchy would have said back.
tannerztigers said:Was one of his mates a couple of years ago before he moved. A terrible terrible story from a promising kid with in respect, a struggling family, who loved him.
Loved his footy, loved his mates, and loved his family.
R.I.P
mb64 said:It is obviously (The meeting) true otherwise there would be denials.There have been numerous opportunities for the club & or players to deny the story & it hasn't happened.
http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25527777-661,00.htmlFreezer said:For those not watching, what happened? Is it Alex Gilmour?
bowden4president said:http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25527777-661,00.html
The "no comment' line basically confirms the meeting & content otherwise there would be a strong denial.Tiger74 said:the meeting is not being denied. we have heard only one perspective of what happened in that meeting though.
by not commenting, the club may be trying to contain what was actually discussed. if they deny, they will have to back up by saying what was said, and that gets a lot more detailed and prolongs the issue.
personally i'd love to shut them up by stating the alternate view, but I get why they may be doing the "no comment" line
mb64 said:Richo would have been better saying nothing,in fact he probably would have been better not coming on tonight.
[/quote
richo defends simmonds and sugar and says its absolute rubbish etc that they were part of the so called player revolt etc, fat hutchy comes on and i was waiting for richo to say something like why are you spreading crap about our club an players.
mb64 said:The "no comment' line basically confirms the meeting & content otherwise there would be a strong denial.
mb64 said:The "no comment' line basically confirms the meeting & content otherwise there would be a strong denial.
Spot ontigerinthetank2 said:dont know why Richo was sh!tty.
Facts are the meeting did happen . Why have a meeting and have players not at training ? :
Everyone covering there backsides.
Get over it RFC. Not Hutchys fault its a circus at punt road
tigerinthetank2 said:dont know why Richo was sh!tty.
Facts are the meeting did happen . Why have a meeting and have players not at training ? :
Everyone covering there backsides.
Get over it RFC. Not Hutchys fault its a circus at punt road