geoffryprettyboy said:Well that's fair enough Rosy, I really didn't think you would open up a can of worms.
Geezus, let it go brother...you're bangin on about nothing.
Save it for your cliquey mates ;D
geoffryprettyboy said:Well that's fair enough Rosy, I really didn't think you would open up a can of worms.
Blueyboy74 said:As I said, I will cop the likes of Martin, Nason, Dea and the like running out of lhs.
They're not the problem though. We have a host of unfit (relative to their opponents) players. This impacts every SINGLE thing they do.... offensively & defensively.
Chocco said:The reason we look unfit is because the turnovers kill us, we have to run into position then the ball doesn't reach it's destination so then we are on the counter. Skillful teams do smarter running and targets get hit meaning the ball is traveling in one direction and your not running around chasing your tale. Once the turnovers stop we will look a lot fitter.
zgod said:I don't think it's a fitness issue at tigerland I really think it's a case of the rabbit being caught in the headlights. When we develop we will tackle harder, run harder and respond with fire when a side gets a run on. At the moment we just lay down when a side puts the blowtorch on us.
geoffryprettyboy said:Is this clique mentatility causing any harm?
What do people expect from a forum when you are on here for nearly a decade, not bump into each other and have a drink, not meet up at a Coburg game or even watch an AFL game?
Everyone has the opportunity to meet each other if they want, hey can you imagine if we alll meet up together we would be one happy family and the word clique wouldn't be used.
We don't lay down Godly one we are just not skilful or developed enough yet to stop another side's momentum.zgod said:we just lay down when a side puts the blowtorch on us.
zgod said:For those that played footy, do you remember when you were 16/17 or 18 and played your first seniors game. I remember the game being open, seriously fast and damn hard. You were battered pillar to post and you found it hard to run out a match.
This is what our young blokes are copping at the moment. I know you could argue that every other young debutant goes through it. I could argue back that they have more stronger and mature bodies surrounding them to guide and protect them.
I don't think it's a fitness issue at tigerland I really think it's a case of the rabbit being caught in the headlights. When we develop we will tackle harder, run harder and respond with fire when a side gets a run on. At the moment we just lay down when a side puts the blowtorch on us.
I know its another excuse and maybe we are just seriously sh#t, but we will come good with what Dimma is doing which is getting games into young blokes. It's hard to watch but it has to be done.
martyshire said:- the fact that we STILL don't project eachother with blocks and shepherds (incidentally this is why our oponents' tackles stick more than ours)
GoodOne said:Agree this is a critical factor. And I'll add to that...communication. You cannot under-estimate communication on the field, being proficient at telling your team mates when they are clear and when they are not, advising who is to go up for the mark, when to punch etc etc. This is often a common issue with young sides, where youngsters don't yet have the confidence or the experience to yell out instruction.
Absolutely agree with your point in case - when you know it's coming you can brace and protect the ball - McGuane's teamates didn't give him that opportunity in that instance - and so everyone says McGuane'e dud - a spillage, clanger. I blamed his three teamates as well Barker! We are a team of mutes still!Barkdog said:yep, case in point, McGuane getting monstered on Sunday whilst 3 of our blokes within 15 metres of him didnt say a thing....people might be saying ahh its McGuane, spanner, dud, no peripheral vision, no awareness blah, blah, blah, but gee it doesnt hurt to let him know that he was about to be poleaxed....
Phar Ace said:Absolutely agree with your point in case - when you know it's coming you can brace and protect the ball - McGuane's teamates didn't give him that opportunity in that instance - and so everyone says McGuane'e dud - a spillage, clanger. I blamed his three teamates as well Barker! We are a team of mutes still!
PS - A couple of recently retired AFL players said the same thing, wouldn't run anyone down (as they shouldn't), but did say RFc is the quietest team on field.
Phar Ace said:Absolutely agree with your point in case - when you know it's coming you can brace and protect the ball - McGuane's teamates didn't give him that opportunity in that instance - and so everyone says McGuane'e dud - a spillage, clanger. I blamed his three teamates as well Barker! We are a team of mutes still!
PS - A couple of recently retired AFL players said the same thing, wouldn't run anyone down (as they shouldn't), but did say RFc is the quietest team on field.
zgod said:For those that played footy, do you remember when you were 16/17 or 18 and played your first seniors game. I remember the game being open, seriously fast and damn hard. You were battered pillar to post and you found it hard to run out a match.
This is what our young blokes are copping at the moment.
GoodOne said:And I'll add to that...communication. You cannot under-estimate communication on the field, being proficient at telling your team mates when they are clear and when they are not, advising who is to go up for the mark, when to punch etc etc. This is often a common issue with young sides, where youngsters don't yet have the confidence or the experience to yell out instruction.
GoodOne said:Fitness and match fitness are two different things. The fittest person in the world may find it difficult to endure a football match without any match fitness. Even with all the latest technologies, I am sure most players would tell you nothing prepares you for footy as matches do. I agree its difficult for young players to wear the hard bumps and tackles of hardened players over a whole match. This only comes with match experience.