Ah but "gender is a social construct"!Quite possibly. Although it comes down to interest too. As in, what type of work the sexes are (in gross general terms) naturally inclined to gravitate towards.
Sorry, going.
Ah but "gender is a social construct"!Quite possibly. Although it comes down to interest too. As in, what type of work the sexes are (in gross general terms) naturally inclined to gravitate towards.
It is all about choice in the end. And as long as education opportunities are available to all and we keep on improving childcare/paid parental leave conditions that “gap” will narrow. Ultimately the ability to have children lends itself to having to make some difficult decisions around career/family. Couples make them all the time.The issue is that women, by virtue of being born women, will on average earn less than if they were born a man, and our society creates that.
“Civilization begins with order, grows with liberty and dies with chaos.” - Will DurantIt is all about choice in the end. And as long as education opportunities are available to all and we keep on improving childcare/paid parental leave conditions that “gap” will narrow. Ultimately the ability to have children lends itself to having to make some difficult decisions around career/family. Couples make them all the time.
My experience growing up was the father worked and the mother raised the children. Mums sometimes had part time jobs, a lot went back to work when kids went to high school. It was what you saw almost everywhere around you. My kids now see all manner of examples of family existence. Stay at home dads. Both parents full time. Before care/aftercare. Single parents. Separated families. Same gender parents. There is no normal now. The stay at home Mum is the exception rather than the rule. Governments will be forced to cater for these family situations. I’m sure this means that gender pay gap will continue to narrow as governments look to give women the ability to be mothers and have careers.
The downside is parents spending less time with their kids and outsourcing their raising.
That's a fairly dry take DS. These boards have a very heavily male bias so to expect it to trend differently is a little naiive isn't it?Who would have thought a thread supposedly about feminism would end up being all about men?
You lot just prove that patriarchy is alive and well.
DS
Again you go with absolute statements such as ‘all about men’ - it’s good trolling.Who would have thought a thread supposedly about feminism would end up being all about men?
You lot just prove that patriarchy is alive and well.
DS
funnily enough the articles doesnt give actual names, but reports the research shows "The businesses most consistent with gender equity policies closed the pay gap for their managerial staff by 4.4 percentage points between 2015 and 2020 while the gap for their non-managers fell by 2.3 percentage points.What did it actually say? Show me examples of business paying women less for doing exactly the same thing.
I think pay should be far more equal, would be a start if it went back to the relative levels of 50 years ago.
The reality is that this is systematic. You don't need to pay different rates of pay for the same job if you promote men more often, you don't need to pay different rates of pay when women have to leave jobs to avoid harassment - the men end up getting paid more because men get the higher paid positions. The whole question about women getting paid less than men for the same job is a diversion and those asking that question well know it.
I don't have all the answers, I would just like some acknowledgement of what is happening. Those who are claiming that there is already equality of opportunity are either incredibly thick, can't see what is staring them in the face or content with the advantages being male offers.
DS
Here is the formula used to quantify the "gender pay gap".
Well you are in the wilderness then aren't you. On one hand you oppose The Labor party policies and then on the other think the Liberal party is alone in elitism.The data produced by the ABS simply states a fact, that there is a gender pay gap in that the average salary paid to a woman in Australia is less than the average salary paid to a man. The reasons for it and what, if anything, should be done about it is what the debate is about
I am not in favour of quotas. I worked for an American company years ago that practiced “positive discrimination” and I don’t believe it works.
I’ve felt the sting of not being in that club myself because of where I came from and what school I went to. It’s exists and is still alive and well in our society ( that club is also within the liberal Party. )
Well unlike many people HR I look at policies rather than the party and there are things that I like and dislike about both.Well you are in the wilderness then aren't you. On one hand you oppose The Labor party policies and then on the other think the Liberal party is alone in elitism.
Good luck with the coin toss between the greens and 1nation.
That's a good reply, I certainly didn't see your unbiased view in the earlier post.Well unlike many people HR I look at policies rather than the party and there are things that I like and dislike about both.
If that means I have issues with both major parties then so be it. Can’t be any other way
I’m not getting involved in any more debate. Drive-bys are permitted.I thought you said you were going to ignore this thread.
Here is the formula used to quantify the "gender pay gap".
Gender pay gap data | WGEA
www.wgea.gov.au
I would hope any Year 7 student capable of independent thought could point out the shortcomings, providing appropriate examples. But instead we are expected to swallow this lie like pre-schoolers.
Sick of hearing the term and I dismiss it outright as a myth.