Those workplaces don't have much of a successful future IMO. Like the liberal party if it refuses to address the sexist/mysogynistic policies and behaviours.Interesting article in The Age today by Jon Faine, all about how men block women, who are more qualified and likely far better candidates, getting pre-selection in the Liberal Party. The fact of the matter is that selection is not on the basis of merit.
https://www.theage.com.au/national/...the-men-block-their-path-20210326-p57e8a.html
If people think this is not happening across a hell of a lot of workplaces then they are kidding themselves.
DS
If we went back 50 years we'd revert to dad at work mum at home.I think pay should be far more equal, would be a start if it went back to the relative levels of 50 years ago.
The reality is that this is systematic. You don't need to pay different rates of pay for the same job if you promote men more often, you don't need to pay different rates of pay when women have to leave jobs to avoid harassment - the men end up getting paid more because men get the higher paid positions. The whole question about women getting paid less than men for the same job is a diversion and those asking that question well know it.
I don't have all the answers, I would just like some acknowledgement of what is happening. Those who are claiming that there is already equality of opportunity are either incredibly thick, can't see what is staring them in the face or content with the advantages being male offers.
DS
If they could only work out how men could have babies it would all be better.