That would be his mate the Weapon, I believe.
Hird allowed it & condoned it.
"Whatever it Takes" says it all.
TBR it seems like you know more than we do about what happened, maybe some insights would help us understand.
That would be his mate the Weapon, I believe.
TBR it seems like you know more than we do about what happened, maybe some insights would help us understand.
I recall Hird in the first press conference admitting it happened on his watch and he'd take full responsibility. He then spent the next 2 years doing everything but take responsibility. None of it could've happened without the club's leadership enablement and support. Using the pawns as scapegoats is just ignoring the environment that was put in place by the likes of Hird. None of them should be allowed anywhere near a club.I agree completely, but the person you should be referring to is Stephen Dank, not James Hird.
I recall Hird in the first press conference admitting it happened on his watch and he'd take full responsibility. He then spent the next 2 years doing everything but take responsibility. None of it could've happened without the club's leadership enablement and support. Using the pawns as scapegoats is just ignoring the environment that was put in place by the likes of Hird. None of them should be allowed anywhere near a club.
I work in the fundamental medical research sphere.
If a researcher did to just one mouse let alone a human, what hird did to 80%+ of the playing group, they would be delicensed immediately and never allowed to use animals or human subjects in their work again.
It is irrelevant what was injected. Making them sign consent forms without any information and cutting the club doctor out of the chain of command the way hird did, was beyond foolhardy. Totally inexcusable. Sackable offence if not jail time. Career-ending for leadership roles. No coming back from that in my opinion.
Yeah nah Big Richo. Disagree with your last sentence. It was not approved by anyone in an appropriate position. They did not work within ASADA/WADA protocols. The Club doctor was taken out of the loop with Hird’s APPROVAL. Because he wasn’t happy with what he was hearing. They got the players to sign a declaration to exonerate the club as they were and I repeat quote “pushing the boundaries”. They fought everything along the way. All the way to the court of appeal in Switzerland.That statement is dragged up on here every time this comes up, to me it is massively overblown.
That press conference was barely a couple of days after they first realised something was up, it's just alpha male coach speak. I'm in charge here lads, I'll take on all comers and you will al be ok. If anything it further emphasises how much Hird had no idea of the enormity of what had transpired.
The most telling part of that press conference for me was Hird saying everything they used was approved and they worked within ASADA and WADA protocols, and that he was shocked to hear otherwise.
Nar, I've been down that road before, people would rather enjoy hating Essendon than hear facts. As soon as I talk about what happens in a club and how it runs I'm accused of big noting or being superior or whatever so I'll leave it.
He can't remember his name let alone what happened at Essendon.I wonder if Thompson will ever come clean about exactly what did go on there?
I can't understand wasnt Dank and Thompson both at Geelong?I wonder if Thompson will ever come clean about exactly what did go on there?
Whatever they were injected with it worked.Any sympathy for anyone involved disappeared when despite repeated questions from ASADA officials they players & football staff failed to declare the injections.
The program was shrouded in secrecy & still nobody knows (or will say) what the players were injected with. They still don't know! Nor how these players will be affected later in life.
Hird should have had his papers stamped from that point on from ever being employed in the AFL again. An absolute stain that remains on the history of the game.
Worth a look back at some of the allegations.That statement is dragged up on here every time this comes up, to me it is massively overblown.
That press conference was barely a couple of days after they first realised something was up, it's just alpha male coach speak. I'm in charge here lads, I'll take on all comers and you will al be ok. If anything it further emphasises how much Hird had no idea of the enormity of what had transpired.
The most telling part of that press conference for me was Hird saying everything they used was approved and they worked within ASADA and WADA protocols, and that he was shocked to hear otherwise.
As long as it culminates in a tidy n relaxing 15 goal flogging from the Tiges, I could live with that.for the first time ever I'll be hoping Essendon wins against the 16 other teams, and finishes runner-up.
That lines up a fair bit with what the Weapon said in his tell all interview. Dank was brought to the club by Danny Corcoran & Hird. Given Hird's previous relationship with Charters he was up to his neck in it.Worth a look back at some of the allegations.
James Hird
The charge sheet also alleges that Hird was warned off the use peptides by an AFL integrity officer in August 2011 - well before sports scientist Stephen Dank joined the club in November that year - after making an "informal inquiry of an ASADA representative as to whether any AFL clubs were using peptides''.
Hird was told by the integrity officer that "peptides were a serious risk to the integrity of the AFL, in the same category as steroids and HGH and implored Hird to report to the AFL if he came across any information relating to peptides''.
Perhaps he didn't mean to push it as far as it went. But saying he shouldn't be responsible based on the above is cods wallop!