I've been wondering about this, too. Or, more accurately, something related to this.
Surely we're close to the time when a contract's terms provide for a coach to 'walk' if his club is actively pursuing an alternative coach.
I just feel so sorry for Rutten. It's immoral what's happening to him. He needs the right to be able to salvage his personal reputation by being empowered to tell the club to get nicked.
Honestly, it's a joke. He inherited a club in re-build mode and was, in part, given a three year term because it takes that sort of time to turn around a poorly performing club.
But, no, the mighty Bombers know better.
Why give him three years if there is a chance you'll bail on him after two?
What a hopeless organisation.
Coaches need the enforceable privilege of being able to fire one back over the bow of dumb clubs like this one.
All true. But everyone knew what sort of a club the Druggies were, so he had to know he was taking a risk.