Essendon = Entitlement | PUNT ROAD END | Richmond Tigers Forum
  • IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.

Essendon = Entitlement

Exactly. Every one has an expiry date and there is a very good chance Clarko has passed his. Everyone seems to think he'll be able to do what he did at Hawthorn but that was nearly 20 years ago when he started.

As for Malthouse, how relevant is he these days? He picked Essendon to win the flag this year :rotfl1:rotfl1:rotfl1
Whaaargh haaaargh haaaragh ! Maybe HE should coach them !!! Whaaargh haaargh haaargh !
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Question. Would you bring Truck back as an assistant like we did with Leppitsch?
Absolutely, no one begrudges him the opportunity at the top gig. He was an excellent back coach. If the soft cap exists then lets go for it. BUT if we had to choose 1 between Truck or Lambert then I think Lambert would best suit our development.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
Exactly. The coach has not been able to recruit the team to suit his preferred gamestyle. Dudoro has been recruiting whomever he wants and it shows. At least Dimma was given time to recruit his style of players.
Clearly our VFL program isn't producing enough quality players for Essendon to poach mid year.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4 users
Aaaaand now Truck is safe.

Subtitles = we asked Clarko and he said no.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 6 users
Got to feel for young D'Ambrosio.

He had the disappointment of missing out on 1, or it might even have been 2 drafts, and then has the misfortune of being selected in the midseason draft by a rabble like Essendon.

 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Pretty good shitshow going on at essington. board just need to let is fester for the rest of the week
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 users
Far dinkum rabble.

It's so good. They are still thinking the problem is the coach and not the talent. The results of the ladder equal the actual list, only people who believe that Essendon has underachieved are the Essendon people trying to turf their 10th coach in 15 years.

Long may it continue. Despise them. They are in as bad a position as we ever were, maybe worse then the dark old days.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: 8 users
I think the big winner out of this coaching race will be GWS. They have actually gone through a proper process.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
The right thing to do is let him lose one more game by 10 goals+
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Aaaaand now Truck is safe.

Subtitles = we asked Clarko and he said no.
Clarkson probably told them their list was crap and would need a thorough clean out. The board didn’t like that. We know what happened to the last guy that told them that :ROFLMAO:
He probably also told them I don’t want sheedy anywhere near the club and dudoro has to go.
Dudoro said no :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 users
More AFL policy on the run regarding the potential Clarkson appointment.

'The North offer is more financially lucrative than the Giants’ bid, however there may be scope for the Giants to bolster its contract via an AFL ambassadorial grant.'
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 3 users
Clarkson probably told them their list was crap and would need a thorough clean out. The board didn’t like that. We know what happened to the last guy that told them that :ROFLMAO:
He probably also told them I don’t want sheedy anywhere near the club and dudoro has to go.
Dudoro said no :)

Dodoro is where’d I’d start if I was fairdinkum about sorting it out. The list is total poo. They bring in one way runners and pay a kings ransom for them, then they don’t understand why they’re so poo.

They’ve got truck and Caracella there. Who are pretty decent coaches. Can’t polish a poo
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
More AFL policy on the run regarding the potential Clarkson appointment.

'The North offer is more financially lucrative than the Giants’ bid, however there may be scope for the Giants to bolster its contract via an AFL ambassadorial grant.'
Didn’t they say that wasn’t on not that long ago? :unsure: