Your opinion is your own business but the assertion I go around trying to find way to slap Richmond players is complete and utter unsubstantiated nonsense.
You really should go back and read some of your posts then
Your opinion is your own business but the assertion I go around trying to find way to slap Richmond players is complete and utter unsubstantiated nonsense.
No, you should go back and read them.
What so called slaps have I handed out? Jack Riewoldt is a good player but I'm not a fan of him as a bloke? That I think Lynch is a good player and by all reports a nice young bloke but is embarrassing himself with the way he is acting outside of the footy on the field? That opposition players aren't fans of the way he acts on field? That I hope he gets good advice and turns it around so he doesn't damage his standing in the game? That Vlastuin might have taunted an opposition player about milking a 50 and IF he did then that was a stupid thing to do?
That's some real machine gun fire compared to the average level of criticism Richmond players get on here.
Whatever it was , it wasnt a big deal. Only our players can be scorned for coping a late hit while taking a courageous mark going blindly with the flight of the ball.
Too right, what are the media suggesting? Either he not go for the ball or not flinch when hit?
How about we get the nice Mr Bell-Chambers to whack the reporters in the neck while running at pace and see if they like it.
DS
And Castagna was more involved, 12 disposals, used his pace and got more of it in close, with a few mistakes but it was a greasy ball.Bank the 4 points, lost no %, and no injuries.
Essendon don't kick 10-1 ever again.
Rioli finally got a kick, Balta's enormous, and only going to get better, Baker & Short killing it off half back, Jack R getting his mojo back, plenty to like going forward.
Yes, interesting the vitriol coming from the Fox commentators. Could be to get more viewer interaction knowing that we have 100,000 members and oppo supporters want our scalp. The fact that Foxtel have been reported as in trouble with a significant drop in subscriptions may be the stimulus for targeting Richmond. That staging by Danger was 1 min before half time in last year's PF. Watched it this morning and such a blatant lurch forward but the umpires and commentators ignored it because he's a protected species.To me Im glad this vision is so close.
3 things wrong! What i want to see. Lynch no case. Hurley is big trouble imo
1. Hurley intentional strike, low impact to hand and has his back to the play. - 1 week suspension or fine
2. Lynch puts forearm to his chest. Holds, then fends off. Hurley stages for a free by pretending hit his neck. - $500 fine for staging
3. Darcy as a commentator. Only thing he wants to note is Lynch fending off as Lynch is the villian. FFS.
Dimma backs aggressive Lynch despite another potential MRO incident
Richmond coach Damien Hardwick has again defended Tom Lynch despite another potential MRO incidentwww.afl.com.au
That's nothing, ask Hawthorn how it feels to go a complete second half without a free!We had zero frees at quarter time. I still don't understand how in this highly interpreted umpiring game any team can go a quarter without a single free.
They expect if two big bodies collide one or both just carry on with not a hair dislodged.Too right, what are the media suggesting? Either he not go for the ball or not flinch when hit?
How about we get the nice Mr Bell-Chambers to whack the reporters in the neck while running at pace and see if they like it.
DS
Our efficiency inside fwd 50 is the glaring issue but mainly against these run of the mill sides where they just pile numbers back. We are certainly getting it in there enough. Let’s see what it looks like agains the cats and eagles who you would think will back their defenders in.
Yeah, but, we didn't get it inside 50 enough against Port. If we improve on that next week I reckon we are very competitive.
DS
The Port game was the polar opposite to the GC and Essendrug games. Against Port we were dominated in the inside 50 count but were extremely efficient when we got there. If we had have been that efficient in the other 2 games we would have had 20 goal wins in both.Yeah, but, we didn't get it inside 50 enough against Port. If we improve on that next week I reckon we are very competitive.
DS
Call it the Kevin Sheedy factor. We might have had the inside running for attracting players to our club for a while with Maurice and co. That all changed when Sheedy defected to the bummers (maybe we appointed the wrong Tiger great as coach?) and proceeded to steal interest and allegiance to the other sash. Then the Dawks tried to pinch it from them, and did so in all probability with Cyril.Was a bombers home game. The crowd was definitely pro-bombers.
Call it the Kevin Sheedy factor. We might have had the inside running for attracting players to our club for a while with Maurice and co. That all changed when Sheedy defected to the bummers (maybe we appointed the wrong Tiger great as coach?) and proceeded to steal interest and allegiance to the other sash. Then the Dawks tried to pinch it from them, and did so in all probability with Cyril.
Now several/most clubs are in the mix.
Is that all? The ball was in our F50 most of the game!Richmond 3 frees in the F50, Essendon 1.
Excellent post. Also think about how the Bummers brought both Stringer and BellCho back for this game. A few posters noted the shape they were in! Both had about 3 disposals; actually S = 3 kicks; B = 3 HBs.I think the staging is born out of frustration. We don’t get free kicks full stop and watch other teams get them for nothing week in week out. So need to make any infringement obvious because we sure as hell aren’t gonna get one in normal circumstances.