And I thought the keeper couldn't take the ball in front of the stumps. That stumping should have been a no-ball.
Amazing game. More twists and turns than an airport thriller.
-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Cricket
- Thread starter mb64
- Start date
Amazing game. More twists and turns than an airport thriller.
No. It made contact with the batsman, so it in effect becomes a run out.
Need to see the replay. The batsmen walked across too. Pakistan a bit unlucky and perhaps shafted in the last over.
A long time ago. Anything down legside is a wide in white-ball cricket.
Fair enough call I reckon. It was his second waist-high full toss in the over. You can't let them keep getting away with that *smile*.
Replay showed it clearly above waist height at the point of contact.
No need for rule books. It was umpired perfectly.
A World Cup was won on 4 runs taken after a deflection off the stumps.
I wasn't sure but it hit the batsmens pad. He was officially out stumped though.
Yeah, I think it's still stumped. They weren't attempting a run.
Man, Indians are excitable people. Gotta love 'em.
He doesn’t have to attempt to hit it. If the ball is down leg side of the batsman’s normal address position, it’s a wide. He half stepped back, then returned to his normal position, meaning the wide call was absolutely the correct one.
OK, just thought it would be a wide if the ball was not in between both return creases.
