It’s a tough one. There is no doubt that being outdoors helps reduce COVID transmission. Warmer climates have done better than colder, there has been more COVID in winter than in summer in Europe and the US. The notable exception is India but that has a lot to do with the sheer number of people in close proximity to each other.I firmly believe the opposite/fully agree if that makes sense.
You need to focus on high risk activities and clearly communicate the risk.
When you focus on what are perceived rightly or wrongly as low risk activity compliance you drive total non-compliance.
This is the failure of leadership in Vic that has actually driven the massive case explosion IMO.
I’ve seen this play put in safety where a focus on all injuries (including first aid band aids) almost equally means you don’t focus enough resources on serious near misses where people almost die (isolation lock out / tag out procedure break downs esp. electrical , confined space entry without BA, working at heights without fall protection). When you shift to focus to what let’s people go home and see their families you get much better compliance to EVErYTHING.
We’d be much better off policing / monitoring for indoor high risk activity than focusing on people in the park running around without a mask or talking to each other.
I don’t know the answer to masks outside but as a personal preference I will just wear one when I can. My own view is that it is a small price to pay but i know others feel differently