I’ll admire gias persistence with personal property rights to the exclusion of everything else. I don’t get the logic, even though I’ve tried.
If a company polluted and didn’t have to pay for the externalities they cause you eventually get backlash / environmental laws / fines / new regulations etc
IMO People choosing not to vaccinate with no good reason pollute the public healthcare system - putting at risk the people who have to look after them, freeloading off the rest of the tax payers and limiting freedom for everyone else, and putting the legitimately unvaccinated at much higher risk. Public health should be there to support people who run into issues in everyday life. You are never going to make it such that say someone who does more risky activities (eg skiing) has to pay more tax than someone who just goes for walks. But at some level if you impose a massive burden on the system deliberately there should be consequences IMO. I take gias point that this could be a slippery slope, but the evidence doesn’t support that line of reasoning as we don’t see this in many areas at all. Maybe tax on cigarettes is one other area where you get a financial penalty in addition to the health risk.
If a company polluted and didn’t have to pay for the externalities they cause you eventually get backlash / environmental laws / fines / new regulations etc
IMO People choosing not to vaccinate with no good reason pollute the public healthcare system - putting at risk the people who have to look after them, freeloading off the rest of the tax payers and limiting freedom for everyone else, and putting the legitimately unvaccinated at much higher risk. Public health should be there to support people who run into issues in everyday life. You are never going to make it such that say someone who does more risky activities (eg skiing) has to pay more tax than someone who just goes for walks. But at some level if you impose a massive burden on the system deliberately there should be consequences IMO. I take gias point that this could be a slippery slope, but the evidence doesn’t support that line of reasoning as we don’t see this in many areas at all. Maybe tax on cigarettes is one other area where you get a financial penalty in addition to the health risk.