-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Coaches votes- 2013
- Thread starter Brodders17
- Start date
bullus_hit said:
What's GC won? 6-7 games? Was he bog in all of them? Don't think so.
We have won 13 and Cotchin has been a stand out in about 7 of them.
Remember last year he didn't get a vote till round 11, this year he will poll 3 starting in round 1..
I backing the Cotch!! :clap
bullus_hit said:
Unless Gazza gets reported in the last 3 weeks, they may as well call the Brownlow count off. He will win it with a record lead IMO.
se7en said:
i thought jacko was bog. had more contested possessions and better disposal than trent as well as some nice passes into 50 and a goal himself. some of trent's kicks were shockers and his missed goals terrible. no doubt everyone sees things differently though. it will be interesting to see how pre votes compare this week, bearing in mind trent is more a poster boy and jacko more a whipping boy.
A agree Rosie. Have been in the "Cotch is champ" camp since day 1 and Jacko "handy for big body but will get overtaken" camp for a couple of years, but will concede that Cotch's disposal has been well below average this year and Jacko more than competent.
Leysy Days said:
He is and so are we. Crucial in our finals push.
Conca has been dudded this week though.
rosy23 said:
funny. dont think i would consider myself in the Jacko whipping boy camp, but i didnt think he was near best on ground on saturday. Cotchin probably BOG, not sure yet who else will get my votes.
Leysy Days said:
you well know it's yet another snide dig at me by goodone. i have already posted why i wasn't voting for cotch again. it's no secret and seeing goodone obviously studies my posting very carefully he'd probably be aware of that. do you recall yourself and a couple of mates spamming several threads with sarcastic comments in regards to votes i gave once. i've never voted for cotch since. like mld i decided to give voting a miss last year but decided why let those who harass me destroy my fun. there are probably several players i've never voted for. i make no secret of the fact of the kind of player i like to give votes to. some go for those who kick goals or get possessions at will. i like to reward defenders and taggers who mightn't get the high stats but do their bit to hold an opposition player. that doesn't mean i don't rate cotch or others i don't give votes to. any objections with that.
Coach A Coach B
5 McLean 5 Simpson
4 Walker 4 McLean
3 Robinson 3 Robinson
2 Deledio 2 Curnow
1 Curnow 1 Deledio
Looks about right. The 2 and 1 votes are interchangeable. Similar except for the wild disagreement about Walker and Simpson.
5 McLean 5 Simpson
4 Walker 4 McLean
3 Robinson 3 Robinson
2 Deledio 2 Curnow
1 Curnow 1 Deledio
Looks about right. The 2 and 1 votes are interchangeable. Similar except for the wild disagreement about Walker and Simpson.
What an indictment of the players that only Lids was awarded votes for RFC. Shows where the overall effort was at. We sure did get ahead of ourselves. Even Richo in his 6-pointers for the round states the team eased pressure after 1/4 time.
A deserved kick up the backside if the players were basking in the glory of having made the finals. They have achieved nothing yet and will not succeed in making / taking the next step unless it is total commitment each week. We do not yet have the talent of the Hawks / Cats / Swans / etc., so cannot afford to ease off during games expecting just to flick a switch to regain ascendancy - we are not yet that good and it is arrogant of the players to think so.
A deserved kick up the backside if the players were basking in the glory of having made the finals. They have achieved nothing yet and will not succeed in making / taking the next step unless it is total commitment each week. We do not yet have the talent of the Hawks / Cats / Swans / etc., so cannot afford to ease off during games expecting just to flick a switch to regain ascendancy - we are not yet that good and it is arrogant of the players to think so.
