-
IMPORTANT // Please look after your loved ones, yourself and be kind to others. If you are feeling that the world is too hard to handle there is always help - I implore you not to hesitate in contacting one of these wonderful organisations Lifeline and Beyond Blue ... and I'm sure reaching out to our PRE community we will find a way to help. T.
Callum Coleman-Judas - extricate yourself to Nth Ballarat, you git
- Thread starter tigertime2
- Start date
I mean technically Adelaide could win the premiership next year.
The CJ trade will go to the wire. If the bargaining power is dictated by the PSD threat, it will be in our interest to wait to see what other deals fall through. If a Cerra or a Dawson can't get deals done, I'm certain Norf wouldn't choose CJ above those blokes
Speak for yourself. I admire the Swannies 'take no BS' approach. We better be very similar behind closed doors AFAIAC. Signs that is the case too. Even Dimma's flippant response on 360 - 'So I hope they're bringing pick 1.' Not merely toying - signalling.
Reap what you sow!?Agree. And puts real public pressure on Adelaide. Look at the articles already written this afternoon in The Age and Fox. Already half agreeing with the Swans claims that Dawson is as worthy as Cerra for a Top 5 pick. Gee Fox's article even tries to compare their stats, etc.
I think their approach is very good. From afar, without knowing what's going on, I wish we were more forthright in our statements on CCJ.
So leaving them with just Goldy, CCJ and the guy they took in the MYD? Thin stocks. Big responsibility on CJ - don't get injured.
Just also added to the Draft Thread.
Michael Gleeson article just published.
www.theage.com.au
The Western Bulldogs’ first round draft pick is being sought by clubs involved in two different deals as a possible key to unlocking talks for Jordan Dawson and Callum Coleman-Jones.
The Dogs’ pick 17, which the club is keen to trade for multiple later draft picks that can secure them more ranking points to help cover a bid for star father-son prospect Sam Darcy than the pick 17 alone would draw, is being sought as a potential circuit breaker in talks for the trades of both Dawson and Coleman-Jones.
Under a trade scenario being canvassed on Tuesday, Adelaide would trade later picks to the Bulldogs for pick 17 but only on the proviso that the pick was sufficient to satisfy the Swans in an exchange for Dawson.
The Crows and Bulldogs were content with the arrangement, but Sydney rejected the deal as insufficient compensation for the player who had come third in their best and fairest.
Richmond and North Melbourne, meanwhile, have also begun discussions with the Bulldogs on a trade for Callum Coleman-Jones that would involve pick 17. Under that scenario, the Dogs would improve their points position, Richmond would secure pick 17, and North would slide a few places in the draft.
Michael Gleeson article just published.
Pick 17 the key: Bulldogs’ first-rounder could unlock two different deals
The Western Bulldogs’ first-round draft pick is being sought by clubs involved in two different deals as a possible key to unlocking talks for Jordan Dawson and Callum Coleman-Jones.
The Western Bulldogs’ first round draft pick is being sought by clubs involved in two different deals as a possible key to unlocking talks for Jordan Dawson and Callum Coleman-Jones.
The Dogs’ pick 17, which the club is keen to trade for multiple later draft picks that can secure them more ranking points to help cover a bid for star father-son prospect Sam Darcy than the pick 17 alone would draw, is being sought as a potential circuit breaker in talks for the trades of both Dawson and Coleman-Jones.
Under a trade scenario being canvassed on Tuesday, Adelaide would trade later picks to the Bulldogs for pick 17 but only on the proviso that the pick was sufficient to satisfy the Swans in an exchange for Dawson.
The Crows and Bulldogs were content with the arrangement, but Sydney rejected the deal as insufficient compensation for the player who had come third in their best and fairest.
Richmond and North Melbourne, meanwhile, have also begun discussions with the Bulldogs on a trade for Callum Coleman-Jones that would involve pick 17. Under that scenario, the Dogs would improve their points position, Richmond would secure pick 17, and North would slide a few places in the draft.
Just also added to the Draft Thread.
Michael Gleeson article just published.
Pick 17 the key: Bulldogs’ first-rounder could unlock two different deals
The Western Bulldogs’ first-round draft pick is being sought by clubs involved in two different deals as a possible key to unlocking talks for Jordan Dawson and Callum Coleman-Jones.
The Western Bulldogs’ first round draft pick is being sought by clubs involved in two different deals as a possible key to unlocking talks for Jordan Dawson and Callum Coleman-Jones.
The Dogs’ pick 17, which the club is keen to trade for multiple later draft picks that can secure them more ranking points to help cover a bid for star father-son prospect Sam Darcy than the pick 17 alone would draw, is being sought as a potential circuit breaker in talks for the trades of both Dawson and Coleman-Jones.
Under a trade scenario being canvassed on Tuesday, Adelaide would trade later picks to the Bulldogs for pick 17 but only on the proviso that the pick was sufficient to satisfy the Swans in an exchange for Dawson.
The Crows and Bulldogs were content with the arrangement, but Sydney rejected the deal as insufficient compensation for the player who had come third in their best and fairest.
Richmond and North Melbourne, meanwhile, have also begun discussions with the Bulldogs on a trade for Callum Coleman-Jones that would involve pick 17. Under that scenario, the Dogs would improve their points position, Richmond would secure pick 17, and North would slide a few places in the draft.
I'm confused what that means then. We get 17, where would North slide from and to? Are they giving up 20 and then sliding to 26, why wouldn't they do that directly with us?
Seems strange we would need to get North involved to get 17 when we just get it ourselves, we currently have 5 picks between 26 and 46 to get it done with.
Unless it somehow gets us 17 and 20 and some of our picks go to North and some go to the Dogs?
It dosent make sense.
We are the ones with the picks,
What's North issue?
Footscary can now pick from 3 clubs.
And i guarantee it wont be us.
Just saying we should be just as disgruntled ( I sure am if we don't get close to pick 20 in return for CCJ etc.)
